this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
1130 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59575 readers
3907 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So they got all that money from Uncle Sam's CHIPS Act only to lay off 10,000 employees and make themselves "lean". Govt funded unemployment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I read it and predicted this outcome in 2022. If Intel wanted to open factories and employ people in the US it would have done so without the CHIPS Act.

No company will say no to free taxpayers’ money, so they didn’t. But they spent it on stock buybacks and now they’re laying off thousands of workers and are selling a defective product.

Now here’s an article for you to read that may be unpalatable https://globalsouth.co/2023/07/10/michael-hudson-why-the-u-s-economy-cannot-re-industrialize/

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Fair criticisms, but the statement from CEO is that the layoffs are to offset fab investments, so there isn't any clear reason to conclude that Intel's US chip manufacturing is dead based on this. We won't be able to infer anything of that sort until we see what areas they actually cut.

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Future promises vs present actions. Only time will tell.