this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
595 points (91.3% liked)

Technology

59575 readers
3611 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cringe2793@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That's what clickbait aims to achieve. Just make people rage. People need to learn to read the article before raging.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I come down to these comments to have someone angrily explain it in simple terms to me.

[–] Cringe2793@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] smeenz 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Cringe2793@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Sucks for you then

[–] kalistia@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Well, the article says: "Google says it will continue to push software and security updates to its newer devices without specifying which ones.".

So only newer devices (and we don't know which ones), and if you are a bit familiar with technology, you would very well know that they will just quit updating the software anyways after some time as they stopped making the whole Chromecast line.

That's still a lot of devices that would be perfectly usable and will eventually go to waste. So imo my remark about the fact that we should have laws forcing manufacturers to make their software open source as soon as they're no longer updated is still valid!

[–] Cringe2793@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think it's perfectly reasonable to not expect a company to perpetually support a sub-$100 device. Especially if said device has been around for 5+ years at least.

[–] kalistia@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

I agree with you that it would be foolish to believe that any company would support a cheap device perpetually but I think it should be common practice (or mandatory) to open the software so that people can extend the life of these devices. Generally speaking, as a species we cannot afford to waste electronic devices simply because the software is not up to date.