this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
390 points (97.3% liked)
United States | News & Politics
1934 readers
337 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Imagining that a prosecutor could achieve the burden of proof on this is wishful thinking. This is yet another post title passing off opinion as fact.
Actual title from the article:
Unless he or Putin come out and explicitly state he was performing diplomacy on behalf of the United States, and not e.g., conducting “personal business”, there is literally no case.
Sure that personal business is undoubtedly quid pro quo, but that’s technically not illegal… just corrupt as fuck.
Do we honestly believe that Trump's international communications aren't being recorded by someone? Doesn't even have to be us thanks to things like Five Eyes.