Technology

59575 readers

3557 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

243

Pluralistic: Bluesky and enshittification (02 Nov 2024) Cory Doctorow (pluralistic.net)

submitted 4 days ago by ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to c/technology@lemmy.world

73 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BatmanAoD@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

What is actually missing from AT Proto to be usable in the way Doctorow describes? He writes:

Bluesky lacks the one federated feature that is absolutely necessary for me to trust it: the ability to leave Bluesky and go to another host and continue to talk to the people I've entered into community with there. While there are many independently maintained servers that provide services to Bluesky and its users, there is only one Bluesky server. A federation of multiple servers, each a peer to the other, has been on Bluesky's roadmap for as long as I've been following it, but they haven't (yet) delivered it.

But according to the source code repo, federation features are fully available, including independent servers. There's even a guide for setting up an independent server: https://atproto.com/guides/self-hosting

Edit: looks like I'm probably not missing anything, and the protocol is fully capable of what Doctorow wants, it just doesn't have any other large instances yet: https://social.coop/@bnewbold/113420983888441504

Edit 2: I found a post that seems much more honest and informative about the actual limitations of AT Proto. In particular:

Relays cannot talk to Relays. If Bluesky Social, PBC decided to show ads (or do something else you don’t like), it would be very hard for you to switch to a different Relay and still be able to interact with all the other folks who stayed at the Bluesky Social, PBC Relay.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’ve read over the documentation a few times and maybe I’ve missed it somewhere else but I’m not aware of any option to host a relay yet. As far as I know only self hosting PDS’s are an option now (which only handle your own data and authentication but still relies on a relay to serve you content from the rest of the network) and app views (which are the front ends that sort and show content)

So in a sense bluesky is distributed and portable within the ATProto network, but still centralized until other entities can host relays and interopt (or opt out of interoperability) within the network.

[–] BatmanAoD@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Here's a post on how to set up a relay: https://whtwnd.com/bnewbold.net/entries/Notes%20on%20Running%20a%20Full-Network%20atproto%20Relay%20(July%202024)

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Thank you for sharing, that’s exactly what I was looking for!

[–] i_understand@mstdn.social 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

@BatmanAoD @ProdigalFrog

How many relays are there?

[–] BatmanAoD@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

...how is it Bluesky's responsibility to set up an independent server? If they're the ones that set up the server, how can it be independent?

Doctorow's complaint only makes sense as a critique of Bluesky itself if he's talking about the technical aspects of AT Proto. If what he really means is just "nobody has bothered to actually deploy and maintain a fully separate relay instance", that's not a problem with Bluesky, it's an ecosystem issue that he could help by encouraging people to do that work, rather than discouraging them from learning about the platform.

I honestly don't have much stake in this fight, I'm just frustrated that, as far as I can tell, Doctorow, an intelligent person with a nontrivial following, appears to be spreading misinformation about what is or isn't possible with Bluesky.

[–] i_understand@mstdn.social 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

@BatmanAoD

If there aren't relays, then there is a reason there aren't relays.

If you feel strongly that you're right about this, then perhaps you should invest in standing up a public relay to prove your point.

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

the reason there arent relays is that theyre expensive to run (150$+ a month, if you rent, and the cost seems to scale linearily with the amount of users on the network), i saw a blog about someone who hosted one briefly (https://whtwnd.com/bnewbold.net/entries/Notes%20on%20Running%20a%20Full-Network%20atproto%20Relay%20(July%202024), and it isnt even that hard to setup, it's mostly just the cost.

Also, relay's aren't technically needed, you could make an appview that pulls from pds's directly.

[–] BatmanAoD@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

As I mentioned above, I don't feel strongly about Bluesky winning, I just don't like misinformation. (I also have other things I care about more that take up what little free time I have for tech stuff already, so I'm not going to undertake something major just to prove a point.) If there's really a fundamental problem with AT Proto and how it can be used, Doctorow's post should have made that explicit.

I did find a (more recent) post that goes into detail about what's lacking, and I've edited my original post accordingly.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

It is kind of weird thay it hasn't been done yet, but in that thread they posted it sounded like it's totally possible at the moment.