this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Rugby Union

469 readers
3 users here now

Rugby union, commonly known simply as rugby. This instance is for news, analysis and discussion of the sport of rugby.

Rules:

No Advertising or Self Promotion

No NSFW or Disruptive Content

No Disrespect or Drama

No Spamming or Off-Topic Content

Be Respectful

Sister Community:
!usmlr@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Friday night rugby, with France vs Argentina to kick off things. Then Sat is Ire vs Fiji, Wal vs SA, and Ita vs NZ. Sun is Sco vs Aus, and Eng vs Japan

Been a great 4 weeks, lets hope for some great matches again! Game of the weekend looks to be Scotland vs Australia, and guess who's going?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TagMeInSkipIGotThis 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Just wanting to add clarity to my opinion about the knock-on call, because its interesting seeing people defend it in the reddit threads.

11.3 just say's "must not intentionally knock the ball forward"

in World Rugby's definitions (https://passport.world.rugby/laws-of-the-game/definitions/):

Forward: Towards the opposition’s dead-ball line.

Ok great, so lots of people are saying because his hands moved the ball forward initially that it is a knock-on; but in this case the law is referring to the ball, not the hands and the ball travelled backwards.

Knock-on: When a player loses possession of the ball and it goes forward, or when a player hits the ball forward with the hand or arm, or when the ball hits the hand or arm and goes forward, and the ball touches the ground or another player before the original player can catch it.

Again, to me this is clearly talking about the the direction of the ball, not the hands or the arms.

So I think people are applying the interpretation given to passing to any action involving the ball to which my opinion is that application isn't relevant here, and is only there for passing because its almost physically impossible to pass the ball backwards while on the run and nobody wants to see a game with 80 scrums for forward passes. Which if we're being pedants would actually be 80 penalties because all of those passes are clearly intentional!

So really the only question's I have left are whether its a penalty to knock a ball into touch or not; it would be if the ball had gone dead, but it didn't it bounced over the sideline instead. I'm just struggling to find law's that mention that bit thus far!

Ah, here it is:

9.7b: A player must not: Intentionally knock, place, push or throw the ball with arm or hand from the playing area.

Now that's definitely a possibility - so perhaps the refereeing team's comms were just shocking when they started talking about the direction of the hand. But does lead to adjudicating on intent rather than facts which I just really hate in general. I'm having a hard time being sure about it, he's definitely knocked the ball away from the other player, and it definitely went out of the playing area. Was he hoping to regather it? At best I can land on a maybe, but that has me going back to my feelings about reasonable expectations and what not - I dunno.