Technology

37735 readers

394 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

224

Greg Rutkowski Was Removed From Stable Diffusion, But AI Artists Brought Him Back - Decrypt (decrypt.co)

submitted 1 year ago by trashhalo@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

249 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Greg Rutkowski, a digital artist known for his surreal style, opposes AI art but his name and style have been frequently used by AI art generators without his consent. In response, Stable Diffusion removed his work from their dataset in version 2.0. However, the community has now created a tool to emulate Rutkowski's style against his wishes using a LoRA model. While some argue this is unethical, others justify it since Rutkowski's art has already been widely used in Stable Diffusion 1.5. The debate highlights the blurry line between innovation and infringement in the emerging field of AI art.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SmoochyPit@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If an image is represented as a network of weighted values describing subtle patterns in the image rather than a traditional grid of pixel color values, is that copy of the image still subject to copyright law?

How much would you have to change before it isn’t? Or if you merged it with another representation, would that change your rights to that image?

[–] whelmer@beehaw.org 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter how you recreate an image, if you recreate someone else's work that is a violation of copyright.

Stealing someone's style is a different matter.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if you recreate someone else’s work that is a violation of copyright.

Only if the work is copyrighted, and your copy does not constitute fair use...

I could create a faithful reproduction of the Mona Lisa (or... I mean, someone could, I sure couldn't), and it's not violating copyright, because the Mona Lisa is not copyrighted.

[–] Crankpork@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I could create a faithful reproduction of the Mona Lisa

You could, but Stable Diffusion couldn't. All it can do is output what it's been fed. It doesn't know composition, or colour theory. It doesn't understand that something is a human, or a fabric, or how materials work, it just reproduces variations of what it's been fed. Calling it "intelligence" is disingenuous: it doesn't "know" anything, it just reproduces what's built into it's database, usually without the artist's permission.