this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
64 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10177 readers
14 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HalJor@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

False. Even the SCOTUS website says this. "The Constitution does not specify qualifications for Justices such as age, education, profession, or native-born citizenship. A Justice does not have to be a lawyer or a law school graduate, but all Justices have been trained in the law."

[–] DarkHeartDom@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I stand corrected. Would appear they were careful in using the term justice instead of judge for that very reason. I do weber what would happen if he were disbarred... would the other justices pressure him to resign, since the disbarment apparently wouldn't affect his status as a justice...

[–] RickRussell_CA@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] DarkHeartDom@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's actually really depressing. We've created a political role based on legal definition that bypasses all of the normal expectations. Not that I'm overly surprised, everything to do with politics is truly all about obtaining and maintaining power however possible.

[–] SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

The issue is that you would have a small group of industry insiders telling everyone else to can and can't be a judge. It would also be easier to target people and prevent them from becoming a judge by getting them disbarred through a non-government process.