this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
171 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

59575 readers
3078 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jasondj@ttrpg.network 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why would you use Pi’s at production scale? Surely there must be better (cheaper, right-sized, readily available) purpose-built ARM SBCs.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Pi's in production is becoming much more common these days.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Lazy solution and 'we'll fix it later'?

[–] flakeshake@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Raspberry Pi Trading Ltd. literally generates most of its income via companies using Raspberries in production. The dual HDMI ports on the RPi 4 are another acknowledgedment of that (the ability to drive two monitors at once was added in recognition of digital signage customers).

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

If not the 4b there are half a dozen cheaper RPi systems that are way more power efficient and capable for this use case.

Imo Raspberry Pi may have shot itself in the foot trying to make bank by overselling the 4B to business customers who didn't need them which exacerbated their shortage for people who DID need them.