this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
103 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

59575 readers
3234 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Lockheed Martin plans to make its most powerful military laser yet, 500 kilowatts::The planned laser will be in the 500-kilowatt range. Weapons like these can defend a ship or base against drones or other projectiles.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

An important thing to remember about any topic is that it's actually more accessible than you'd think.

Even quantum computing boils down to basic matrix math that you can learn in 5 minutes, the concept of superposition, and an understanding of logic gates. These are all intimidating concepts, but always, always, always complicated terminology is just simple concepts stacked onto each other.

That stuff about the inverse square law... all it is is being aware that it's an equation that measures how weak an omnidirectional signal gets the farther away from it you move. So, for example how much light a lightbulb would send into your eye based on how close you are to it.

Lasers use phased lightwaves that don't dim at a distance the way a lightbulb does because they are not omnidirectional. All their light is highly focused in one direction.

So when he mentioned the inverse square law it sounded wrong to me, so I asked the question. I didn't know. Maybe it's a modified version of that equation?

It never hurts to ask. And it turns out that he did misspeak. He corrected himself, and now I've learned just a tiny bit more than I knew before.