this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
363 points (93.5% liked)

Lemmy.world Support

3230 readers
27 users here now

Lemmy.world Support

Welcome to the official Lemmy.world Support community! Post your issues or questions about Lemmy.world here.

This community is for issues related to the Lemmy World instance only. For Lemmy software requests or bug reports, please go to the Lemmy github page.

This community is subject to the rules defined here for lemmy.world.

To open a support ticket Static Badge


You can also DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport or email report@lemmy.world (PGP Supported) if you need to reach our directly to the admin team.


Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages 🔥

https://status.lemmy.world



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
363
Please fix Rule 1. (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by remotelove@lemmy.world to c/support@lemmy.world
 

A shroom community was removed from lemmy.world as it was considered "illegal" content by the admins. The logic behind this is boggling, to say the least.

Marijuana is considered an illegal substance in some states in the US and is still federally illegal. /c/trees should be banned, correct?

Clown pictures of Putin are absolutely considered illegal in Russia, so that should require and immediate ban.

Freedom of speech can also be considered illegal in some places.

Incest is considered illegal so that should automatically trigger a ban on all incest porn, real or not. Hell, porn is universally taboo, so that shouldn't have any place on this instance, I guess.

You see where I am going with this? Rule 1 is a catch-all and needs clarification. Simply saying something is illegal is not quite enough. Owning and sharing pictures of shrooms is not illegal. Trading spores or mycelium is generally not illegal either.

This is not about me being salty (which I am) about the community being removed and forced to relocate. It's the odd bias that was applied to justify its removal.

Please note that I said fix Rule 1, not remove it. There are some really bad things on the internet that shouldn't use lemmy as a safe haven.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PetteriSkaffari@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We have to admin the admins.

[–] Rearsays@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It really doesn’t matter how hard you want to push back on these rules. If the servers for the instance you’re complaining about are there to protect them against laws, granted, misguided laws. For the sake of the longevity of the instance, then, so be it, you have the freedom to take a walk and find a better spot to have a picnic. That’s the benefit of a federated universe.

[–] GodzillaFanboy129@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It matters if we stop donating to them. If that happens, which it could since a lot of people are quite mad at them it would be detrimental to them. I'm all for it to be honest, people shouldn't donate to someone they dislike or view as crooked.

[–] Rearsays@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

Why would you give money so to an instance you don’t use. You don’t even have to support the original Lemmy people if you don’t like their politics you can just use kbin