Fake History Porn

4405 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to /c/fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world , where fake history is made. Find a historically significant photo, come up with a fake history title, post it, laugh.

The name is a reference to the fact that the pictures should be worth marveling at. This is NOT a place for hardcore pornography. Tasteful nudity is fine as long as it fits within the context of the post (please mark it as NSFW).

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

dystop@lemmy.world

The Navy's "Skins vs Shirts" policy was short-lived (1944) (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Lauchs@lemmy.world to c/fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world

NSFW 8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] gibbedygook@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i totally understand why the pilot did it, of course. but technically, isn't he violating international law (i think its the geneva convention) which says you have to wear a distinguishable uniform in battle?

[–] Especially_the_lies@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago

He's not on the battlefield, he's in a machine with his country's identifier painted on it.

Now, if the plane crashed and he survived it might be an issue.