this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
903 points (85.5% liked)

Antiwork

8292 readers
3 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Yayannick@lemmy.ml
uthredii@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
yogthos@lemmy.ml
903
I sure as hell don't. (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world to c/antiwork@lemmy.ml
274 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] misterfenskers@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Regulations for everything would not allow the greedy pigs to make their own rules. What you're asking for is that they gain some sort of heart and start valuing something other than their products. That won't happen. I really think regulation is a better plan because it's creating laws that cap profits. Then we can hit em with their own medicine and up the minimum wage too. Maybe even put a maximum wage out there.

Maybe I've seen too much star trek and I'm believing that the socialist/communist utopia exists out there someday. Maybe I'm crazy. All I know for sure is I don't like the hand I was delt and it's way too hard to fold.

[โ€“] uis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe even put a maximum wage out there.

Reminds me Savateev's proposed education reform. Cap school directors' wage at something like 2x-3x of lowest of top-60%(below median) teachers' wages in conjunction with banning overtime more than 50%(hard cap work time at 150% of normal, currently over 200% is common practice which is really bad).