this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
891 points (97.2% liked)

Ukraine

8285 readers
608 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] expected_crayon@lemmy.world 197 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Yet he’s taking DoD money for Starlink in Ukraine. At what point do his antics turn from the craziness of a billionaire to espionage and being deemed a Russian asset?

[–] DarkenLM@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It would be hilarious for the US and/or the EU freeze his assets and punch his market influence to the ground if they accuse him of espionage.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nationalizing the satellites that we paid for as a national security asset sure seems reasonable here, seeing as he likely broke a contract when he disabled them.

Imagine if Lockheed disabled an allied F16's targeting computer during a mission; there would be hell to pay.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

it's more like a violation of War Powers Act or something, but yeah.. he's probably fucked..

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've said in the past that something was clearly wrong when he bought Twitter. His behavior was far too targeted. It's all way too obvious.

[–] Joker@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

He’s my fun little conspiracy theory. If I could send the CIA to do my bidding, I would have punished him by manipulating him into buying twitter. You can’t nationalize SpaceX because it would signal the failure of privatized space exploration, but you can’t have that idiot out there as a walking national security disaster looking for a place to happen. The only option if he can’t be controlled is to get him out of the way until he retires or another private competitor can become the favorite. Twitter cost him a ton of money and his reputation, exposed him as a fool, and keeps him busy with unimportant bullshit. Everyone just shrugs it off as Elon being Elon. It’s really perfect.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 4 points 1 year ago

Yet he’s taking DoD money for Starlink in Ukraine.

He is now but at the time this supposedly happened he wasn't.

[–] demlet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Musk openly stated that he spoke directly with Putin after the Ukraine invasion had started. The super wealthy have no loyalties and will sell anyone and anything to the highest bidder. I've said it before, every penny after $1 billion needs to be taxed at 100%. Time to reign in the oligarchs.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that just liquid assets, or do you also want to tax them on stock they own in companies?

[–] demlet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Honestly I don't know. It's really more the sentiment that I'm expressing. I'm aware that the wealthy are very good at playing shell games. No measures would catch everything.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

Agree in principle but the ultra wealthy would simply find new creative ways to hide their income.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Wealth taxes are fantastic in theory, but in practice have never worked. They're too hard to implement. I agree with the spirit of what you're saying, but I just don't think a wealth tax is the answer.