this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
633 points (99.8% liked)

196

16552 readers
2001 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] moonsnotreal@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd rather have a polished 10 hour game than a buggy 50 hour game

[–] MudMan@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool, that helps a bit, if they're both the same kind of game.

But just so we're clear, you can have a 10 hour game that results from abhorrent crunch over several years. Or that is super buggy and unpolished.

Personally, I find that there is no perfect length for all games. If it's a narrative game it's easier to pace a shorter game, sometimes, and it's often easier to at least see the end, at least.

Of course you can also make a game with no ending at all. I am less and less interested in narrative games as time goes on.

[–] Afghaniscran@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

I'm a sucker for a good story or just brainless fun. For example, rdr2 story would've been fine for me even without the open world, the storyline drew me in. I also like rocket league cos big ball and explosions.