this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
313 points (95.1% liked)

Programming Humor

2681 readers
1 users here now

Related Communities !programmerhumor@lemmy.ml !programmer_humor@programming.dev !programmerhumor@kbin.social !programming_horror@programming.dev

Other Programming Communities !programming@beehaw.org !programming@programming.dev !programming@lemmy.ml !programming@kbin.social !learn_programming@programming.dev !functional_programming@programming.dev !embedded_prog@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
2e8a9d6bb6935a54@lemmy.world
313
Enjoy (lemmings.world)
submitted 1 year ago by Alby003@lemmings.world to c/programminghumor@lemmy.world
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or just a service like browserstack, much cheaper and easier than needing 100 devices. Obviously a bit of non-automated real device testing is a good idea too, but most of it should be automated.

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That's if your management wants to invest in a BrowserStack subscription. I work in consulting and the budget the clients want to spend on test automation are zero.

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

We had issues with browserstack. It would cache apps on android/iOS between machines. My company had to let them know that it was a security risk. Hope they fixed it.