this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
23 points (92.6% liked)

Australia

3618 readers
83 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] No1@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] TiredSpider@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

admittedly that's an issue with the study and I'm glad you brought it up. This runs into the issue of how else could you collect the data? If you just go off reports or surrendered dogs you will miss out on smaller breeds like chihuahuas whose aggressive behaviour isn't seen as serious enough to do anything about, as well as bias in the form of being more likely to label an aggressive dog a pit.

I think the more important thing to put forward here is that many of the participants didn't actually know their dogs genetics. Like pointed out in the video if you have a mutt you really have no idea of it's dna without testing. If aggression was a genetic issue you might expect the owners of smaller dogs like chihuahuas to admit to aggression, since doing so would not put their pet at risk, then the dna testing could show a commonality between their genes and the genes of more maligned breeds. Unless aggression if specifically linked to traits like a big muscular head, this seems like the smoking gun that this is a cultural issue.

I also haven't seen any studies with different methodology find a link between aggression in certain breeds with genetics in any statistically significant way. This was just the largest study I've seen.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you just go off reports or surrendered dogs you will miss out on smaller breeds like chihuahuas whose aggressive behaviour isn’t seen as serious enough to do anything about

I’m not sure what the best methodology is, but I’m not sure this objection really holds much weight.

Because if a dog is "aggressive" but unable to actually cause any real harm…what does it matter? I’m most interested in taking an approach that actually reduces harm. That’s naturally going to mean that larger dogs are more likely to be affected than smaller ones, and I see no problem with that.

[–] TiredSpider@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

because then if it is genetic and someone's chihuahua or other small dog runs off and sires pups with a larger dog you've got the same issue all over again.