this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
593 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

59575 readers
3078 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"If you’ve ever hosted a potluck and none of the guests were spouting antisemitic and/or authoritarian talking points, congratulations! You’ve achieved what some of the most valuable companies in the world claim is impossible."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gullible@kbin.social 55 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There is one complaint that I have about the mods across Lemmy, they seem to be hesitant to crack down on trolling. This has, in turn, made trolling easy thanks to the audience Lemmy attracted. Love the mods here, but when someone calls out a troll, maybe don’t remove the comment calling out the troll and leave the troll alone to continue trolling. Your contribution is actively negative if you do this.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Damn, I thought I was the only person who noticed this. It's just like being in elementary school all over again. The bullies run rampant, but any time anyone stands up to the bullies, they get in trouble while the adults (mods) ignore the various abuses the bully gets away with regularly.

Life never really changes, does it?

[–] ExcursionInversion@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've seen very little trolling, definitely not rampant for what I'm subbed to. I have seen a fair amount of people that become offended by silly stuff.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've seen the main two types of trolls: people who try to cause problems in a subtle way for the sake of entertainment (the good trolls), and the ones that attract downvotes by saying the dumbest shit you've ever read (the bad trolls). I actually enjoy the good ones, it seems like they don't tend to show up unless there's already a flame war going on, and they can be pretty funny. The bad trolls are just assholes in disguise. Sadly the bad trolls tend to get ignored.

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People don't agree on what's dumb shit to say is the problem.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's more that they say it in what appears to be an intentionally inflammatory way. Like, sometimes there are really bad takes that seem trollish on their own, but when someone says it in an inflammatory way, it's hard not to see them as a troll.

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Honestly, I say shit that people disagree with and are pissed off about pretty often.

But personally, I only really run into what I'd actually consider trolls on occasion.

More often than I'd like, sure, but I guarantee you there have been people who think I'm a troll just because I have and voice a strong opinion that they disagree with in a way that they can't comprehend or deal with.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is false consensus somehow related to subjective opinions?

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago

Eh, sometimes. Sometimes there are really bad takes that feel trollish on their own, but most of the time it's a bad opinion stated in a seemingly intentionally inflammatory way.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I've seen people who had profiles that literally professed that they only existed to troll, and their accounts lasted longer than people who said something wrong politically regarding Israel/Palestine.

[–] ExcursionInversion@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lol that's wild, trolling on here seems pointless with the low user base.

Not gonna lie I filtered out Israel, Palestine, and hamas when that started, because of the differing political groups being so hard line/obnoxious in the comments.

trolling on here seems pointless with the low user base.

You would think that, right? Some people legit have nothing better to do.

I mean, I know I've got nothing better to do than dick around online, but like... I still want to have real conversations and not just try to upset people. It's really weird, unhealthy, antisocial behavior.

[–] gullible@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s mostly in the politics communities, for all the good that information does you. It’s incredibly blatant, though that doesn’t stop folks from biting the hook given the spectrum of people here.

[–] ExcursionInversion@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel bad for anyone who mods a politics community. Those comment sections are insufferable.

[–] gullible@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They chose their torture… but yes, the comments they sift through are among the worst in the fediverse.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the same groupthink that happened on reddit. Someone says something incidiary, another responds, and depending on the slant of the community, people dog pile. Same shit happens, as you said, in life.

[–] JustinHanagan@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I think it's important to keep in mind that the Fediverse doesn't solve any of the problems that come up when a bunch of people talk about stuff they're passionate about. The problems Federation solves is the incentivizing and spotlighting of the sorts of toxic behavior we see on corporate social media.

[–] darq@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Yup, that's what happens whenever "civility" is the primary metric used for moderation.

Trolls post heinous nonsense, and respond to people in the most insufferable rage-bait-y manner. But if anyone so much as calls them an asshole, they get their comments removed for saying a no-no word.

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Defining "trolling" is complex.

People have unpopular opinions that they vehemently defend.. it's not always bait or just being an asshole for the fun of it.

[–] gullible@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The difference between “notice me, I’m an attention-seeking asshole” and “notice me, my opinion is unpopular” can be difficult to discern, but becomes obvious with context. Most especially when you both point them out and provide the context. As an attention-seeking asshole, it’s a bit frustrating to be told that I can’t recognize someone doing what I do, but far less subtly.

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think just the nature of social media in and of itself creates "trolls"...

Everyone seems to think WE all know everything about everything and we just can't resist the compulsion to tell and "educate" others .

[–] gullible@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s precisely why it can be frustrating to attempt to save someone the headache of engaging with a person speaking in bad faith, only to have the warning removed and to be told “don’t do that again, you’re being rude.” There are quite a few naturally occurring issues with social media, not least of which are trolls, and to hand wave them does little to improve the situation.

Look, all I’m saying is that if I see a streak of people writing dissertations in reply to a visibly disingenuous commenter, my warning might be worth keeping.

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol... I don't even know what to say to you anymore...

It basically goes back to what I said earlier... People define things differently and believe and are passionate about different things.

"Bad faith" is something that people may not always agree on and could be considered subjective, too.

Cool though... I guess it kind of proves my point actually.

[–] gullible@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Dude, it’s accounts named “boomer opinions” or “communist git” roleplaying as racists and extermination enthusiasts. I understand your point, you just lack context and a relevant point. Had you asked rather than affirmed, you might have had both.