this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
419 points (93.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

32555 readers
450 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Haaaaaang on is that why we start on 0...

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No. We count start at zero because the array already starts with an element of a specific size. Starting at 1 would always skip that initial element.

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You could have "empty arrays" in a language if you wanted. The real reason is that you start with an offset of zero as you read an array from memory at hardware level, and so this way address is just "start address + element size * element number".

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, we start counting at one. We start indexing at zero.

An array with one element has an element count of 1, and that element would be at index 0.

[–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

This is how we end up with off-by-one errors

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Because if you convert it back to binary, you have 0x0000 and that is one extra bit you can use instead of limiting your available values.