this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Self-Hosted Main

515 readers
1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

For Example

We welcome posts that include suggestions for good self-hosted alternatives to popular online services, how they are better, or how they give back control of your data. Also include hints and tips for less technical readers.

Useful Lists

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
communick@selfhosted.forum
4
What would you use to optimally store videos ? (alien.top)
submitted 1 year ago by jyroman53@alien.top to c/main@selfhosted.forum
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hello Everyone,

I'm currently looking for a way to optimise even further the amount of video file I have, I mainly store anime and series episodes.

Currently what I do is : Getting the video on my main computer (5800X3D + 1080ti) Convert it using Handbrake to H265 NVENC then store it on my server which is basically a Ubuntu server (i7 8700 no graphic cards) with mainly a zfs pool.

I'm looking to improve this to getting directly the video on my server, converting it using handbrake (I'm considering getting an intel ark card to switch to AV1 instead of H265) and storing it directly on it.

The issues I'm currently facing are mainly concerning Handbrake itself, the support on linux using hardware encoding looks limited I still have to make more testing but I was wondering if anyone got a better solution than what I'm currently envisaging.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grizzlechips@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Considered doing this a few months ago. Depending on the size of your library, it’s a mixed bag. Some concerns:

  • People on the Plex communities talk about the H265 conversion never being as good a quality as a conversion from a primary or secondary source. I’m not a quality purist, but it might be an issue for some pieces for you. Worth considering.

  • I ran a test on a season of a TV show I had in 1080p, and the results were about a 70% decrease in file size for each episode, which was huge, but the problem for me was that it (an admittedly very old gaming desktop) took about 6 hours per episode to get that. Having a machine churn like that for the extended time required for a whole library introduces a whole host of issues re: hardware fatigue, heat, electricity, sound, tying up your machine during the whole process, and I’m sure plenty more I’ve forgotten to mention, that might limit the value of embarking on such a task.

  • It’s generally considered to be much cheaper (and a better use of all of your resources) to just spend what you’d spend doing that on more storage. 16 TB drives running ~ $200 will last anyone except the most extreme 2% of DataHoarders very well for media storage for quite a while.

Anyways, I hope any of this helps. I ended up holding off. The storage space savings are tempting, but the path there is expensive (in more than just $) and probably not worth the investment for most.