this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
411 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

37758 readers
619 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vortexal@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know what, this makes me feel a lot better about using an ad-blocker when using their site. Although, I would prefer if the artists I listen to didn't exclusively use Spotify for some reason.

[–] tesseract@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm all for ad blockers. But this doesn't solve the creators' issue with not getting paid. The internet is a severely underutilized resource. Creators should be able to sell their content directly to us without middlemen like these.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Creators should be able to sell their content directly to us without middlemen like these.

They can and do. Most are just lazy/uneducated/choose not to.

[–] vortexal@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

I agree with that and some of the artists I listen to actually do use platforms where you can purchase their music directly but unfortunately buying the music directly just really isn't viable for me. Platforms that use ads for monetization are really the only way that's viable but the artists I listen to only use Spotify, or if they do use other platforms, they just use them for demos and other promotional stuff.