this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
1430 points (95.8% liked)

Memes

45759 readers
944 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] essellburns@beehaw.org 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's not the same thing.

Judging behaviour and actions is entirely different to judging people for who they are.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

People are compiled of their actions and behaviors so I am not really getting what you are trying to say.

[–] essellburns@beehaw.org 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Some traits are inherent / congenital, historically these were used to judge and "cancel" people

Still are at times

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I dont recall the religious right cancelling people due to their inherent characteristics. On the other hand, the left actively discriminates against people for the same thing.

[–] essellburns@beehaw.org 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oh really? I wonder if a religions have ever used gender to define what roles a person can have and who gets a platform?

I'm not sure if we're just definitely terms differently or you're lacking an understanding of history here.

The religious right has always given a voice to a small number of people and cancelled everyone else

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

So you are going to point to women cant be head pastors in some churches as indication that they cancel people due to inherent characteristics?