this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
1329 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

59575 readers
3078 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I didn't say it means it's wrong, just that it's not going to be an accurate picture. It might be right, it might be wrong, we have no idea - which is why they put that qualifier there.

There's nothing indicating twitter isn't still largely stable.

Also that's not a DDOS since there was no denial of service. Those calls are likely all just getting stopped at a cloudflare (or alternative) level anyway.

[–] HeavyDogFeet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There was no denial of service because they rate limited accounts. That’s the entire point. Had they not done that, it’s likely they would have overwhelmed their servers and crashed the service, resulting in denial of service.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But no one knows when that repeated call was added to twitter - it could have been there for years. Like I said, it also likely just gets caught by cloudflare etc when it's doing that, meaning it's not going to overwhelm anything.

You're saying that they did a release, realised it was going to DDOS itself, so then rate limited accounts in another release rather than simply roll back the broken release or fix the call? That doesn't make any sense.

[–] HeavyDogFeet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They didn’t realise it was going to DDOS itself, it was in the process of hammering their servers and they rate limited accounts because they didn’t know what was happening. It was still making excessive calls when they were rate limiting.

It makes no sense because the things they’re doing aren’t the actions of a competent team with a knowledgeable tech lead.

I think I’ve made my point pretty clear by now. If you’d still like to believe they’re not useless, go for gold, but the facts doesn’t support that.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s 100% guessing based on nothing more than your wild speculation. You have no facts to support it.

[–] HeavyDogFeet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, neither do you. This is all speculation since it’s a private company run by a known liar.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not the one making claims, you are. You’ve got nothing to support those claims.

As a developer myself I’m 99.9% sure what you’re claiming didn’t happen because it makes no sense from a dev standpoint.