Arch Linux

7777 readers

1 users here now

The beloved lightweight distro

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

As a capable but lazy user, how much would switching to Arch frustrate me? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 6 months ago by lorty@lemmy.ml to c/archlinux@lemmy.ml

67 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I know my way around a command line. I work in IT, but when it comes to my personal fun time more often than not I'm quite lazy. I use windows a lot because just plugging in anything or installing any game and it just working is great.

But support for windows 10 is ending and I should probably switch sonner rather than later, so I'm wondering if Arch would be a good pick for me? For reference, I mostly game and do Godot stuff in my free time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Arch requires a lot of effort to maintain.

[–] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 6 months ago

That's just a lie

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Did you craft a very unorthodox and complex system? If so, I can believe you.

However, I went with a very traditional system with ext4, no fancy partitions, X11 and Gnome. I didn’t want my system to have anything experimental, because I knew I had to learn a bunch of stuff anyway. Just made everything as simple as possible, so that I can understand what’s going on.

So far, there hasn’t been a lot of system maintenance. Obviously it’s still more than what a Debian system would require, but nothing too crazy.

[–] JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Nothing too complex, no. KDE desktop, some stuff from the AUR. LVM on LUKS.

Perhaps it's more fair to say that Arch takes more effort to maintain than any other well known distro except Gentoo (or LFS, if one considers that well known).

I found keeping up to date on a fairly bleeding edge rolling release distro exhausting. I would, too often, come across issues with updates that required manual intervention to solve. And the AUR can be a crapshoot as far maintainers keeping them up to date and applying fixes. Nothing unmanagable, but not an enjoyable experience for me.

No hate intended on Arch though. I think it's one of the best distros out there, and the Linux community as a whole is better off for it's existence. But it's not something I want as my daily driver, and I suspect from what OP wrote, it might be the same case for them.

Edit: Reworded AUR bit for clarity.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 months ago

Most likely AUR is the main issue here. I’ve specially avoided it to make my system as simple and easy as possible, so my experience has been a bit different. The thing about Arch is that every system is unique, and it’s hard to say something that would apply to all of them.