Gaming

30563 readers

67 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

Whom@beehaw.org

The_Hunted_One@beehaw.org

chloyster@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

399

Starfield's already the top seller (beehaw.org)

submitted 1 year ago by tango_octogono@beehaw.org to c/gaming@beehaw.org

359 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Griseowulfin@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess I'm biased as someone who started on Skyrim, but that's my point of comparison for games anymore. Fallout 3 was awesome, but honestly when FO4 came out, going back to play FO3 was hard due to how clunky it was in comparison. I know FO4 fell flat with it's character decisions and voiced protagonist but it really didn't ruin the game like it did for lots of people.

Disclosure: I never finished the earlier TES games, because Skyrim coddled me I guess. lol

[–] pieceofcrazy@feddit.it 2 points 1 year ago

I'm biased in the opposite way since I started with Fallout New Vegas, but to me FO3 wasn't THAT good either. It's a good game, but its narrative design is still mediocre. FO4 was a really good upgrade in terms of gunplay, but I hated the story, side quests and the changes to the perks system.

To me, Bethesda games feel like big worlds with lots of quests and items, but completely flat narratively and thematically/philosophically.