this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
64 points (98.5% liked)
Asklemmy
43945 readers
536 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
My thoughts are what if the instance admins or mods are pricks? What if the instance shuts down?
I think the power of the fediverse is that there is redundancy with the communities on different instances. I feel like it's a very human need to have everything neatly organized and in its place, but the internet is all about redundancy to ensure no single points of failure.
The fediverse mimics that by creating a web of small related communities, spread out over multiple instances, ran by different people, rather than a giant single community for one thing, on one instance, run by one person.
This was the case with Reddit as well, there were a lot of competing subs created due to shitty mods and rules so I don't think it'd be much different in this case
There was a r/Yankees subreddit that had awful mods, so some people created r/Nyyankees and basically everyone moved there.
The real issue with instances shutting down is losing access to a user account. Correct me if I'm wrong, but there would be no way to login/recover an account from an offline instance.
Im honestly not entirely sure but that seems to be the case. Everyone is worried about mod power and decentralization but what about the power of instance owners over your own account? If I take the time to link a bunch of external communities to one instance, what happens if the instance goes down? All that work is gone
This is a good point and makes me wonder: is there any interest in running a personal instance that has no communities, just for the sake of being in control of your own identity? Would that even be an appropriate thing to do? And if so, how would you convince instances to federate with you if you have no content?
I think (I heard) federating is opt-out, so unless instances specifically block you, you should be able to subscribe to anything anywhere. I will probably host my own instance if this is the case!
Being able to host a local instance seems like a really interesting approach to owning your own user data. Also a way to have a "blog" site like the relatively new profile posts on reddit.
That's why I made an account in every instance I was interested in. I don't cqre about my post history and what not and if i want to keep important info I'll just save the page to my phone.
actually, the fediverse isn't about redundancy. It's about interoperability. Anyone being able to host their own "reddit" and still being able to communicate with the other "reddits".
And the interoperability does bring resilience to the whole, because if a part of the system goes down (or goes to sh_t), then it's only that part. But resilience is not quite the same as redundancy.
For redundancy you're more looking at something like nostr, which functions with relays that can replicate the content being posted from all users of the network.