"suddenly take a dangerous turn"?
What direction did they think his actions were headed?
this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
189 points (93.2% liked)
politics
19120 readers
2704 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
For real. This is a straight path. No turning necessary.
Who ever could have seen this coming?! So outta the blue!
You’re right. There has been plenty of danger from his posts. From the insurrection, to driving a car through BLM protests, the attack on Paul Pelosi, charging the FBI headquarters, and attempting to drive onto Capitol Hill.
This is the video to which the article is referring.
dangerouser
😮
… suddenly?
To be fair, you can't expect the news to know about things that happen.
Dear media,
You're maybe two verses of Niemoller's poem from "...and there was no one to speak for me.".
Stop carrying water for this man and his sycophants, it will not end well for you, or anyone you care about.
Scarborough is a Reagan Conservative. That he's being branded a "Liberal" because he disagrees with the MAGA camp should be a scary item in and of itself.
Correct. And a neocon. That's the GOP exit strategy when the Trump cult collapses: We never thought it would go this far, but we are back to our core conservative principles which are just about the same but without the clowning.
The media and the oligarchy need to become self-aware of the threats in front of their faces. Maybe then the former will return to doing its job for us and our safety and not for the latter.
We used to have laws that decentralized control of media. An entity could only own a certain number of newspapers, tv stations, or radio stations. There were incentives for smaller news companies to insure that there was competition in each market. Congress kept chipping away at those laws letting larger companies buy up more and more of the market, allowing mergers that restricted competition. Now radio is nearly a monopoly, TV and newspapers are oligarchies. The Internet fell into an oligarchy disturbingly quickly.
The only way to get the media serving the people again is to break up the big companies and restore the guardrails that protected and supported small local companies.
I hate to say it, but that will never happen. Politicians only chase the money, and the money wants to keep their monopolies and oligarchies.
These videos are more dreadful than most. Nothing works quite like that to make you realize just how prepared and aimed cable news is. When I see shit like "Russia's state-run news agency says" I wonder if CBS, NBC, CNN, and FOX are our equivalent when something from one of them is posted abroad.
🌎👨🚀🔫👨🚀
Media is shocked. Shocked, I tell you!
Danny Boy has forgotten he's Lebanese. He's not on the favorites list for White Nationalists sadly, and Uncle Donnie will deport him. Jesus these people are fucking clueless about what he is.
White isn't about who you were born to. It's about who you hate.
I understand the sentiment, but I can't agree with this. Plenty of business owners in China placing signs like "no Africans allowed" at their entrances. They're not white.
This was specifically in the context of American white nationalism. Pointing out Chinese policies is very much missing the point.
That being said, I'm not here to argue. If you want to point out that a pithy rhetorical phrase is lacking in nuance, I'll be the first to say you're absolutely right.
Sorry, friend. I was being pedantic. Point taken.
I don't know, mate. Maybe some folks needed to be told. I do sometimes have an overly optimistic appraisal of my fellow humans. Keep on trucking.
yes what a turn
Some will give Trump the benefit of the doubt. Surely Trump thought the video was funny. Surely he only intended his MSNBC nemesis as the target. Surely calling a person or group “done” is just a figure of speech. And Scarborough doesn’t appear to feel threatened by the guy in the video. He was just a crank, right?
And the rest will correctly read the message and violence will occur and Trump's hands will be clean because "obviously he was misinterpreted."