this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
89 points (73.8% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2372 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Activists from around the country told The Intercept that they will advocate for an anti-war agenda at the convention in August and withhold their vote in November unless an adequate candidate steps up, listing policy priorities such as support for a permanent ceasefire and standing up to the pro-Israel lobby as it intervenes in Democratic primaries. Even as the Biden campaign insists that he will not step aside, many Democrats appear to be lining up behind Vice President Kamala Harris as an alternative candidate, with some Democratic governors being floated as well.

“My number one criteria for any candidate is opposing the genocide in Gaza,” said Saad Farooq, an uncommitted voter in Massachusetts. Farooq said it was unlikely that the Democratic National Committee would select any candidate who took a stance against Israel’s ongoing war, and that he would support Green Party candidate Jill Stein if she were to appear on the ballot in Massachusetts.

Will Dawson, an uncommitted voter in Washington, D.C., named several factors that could get him to switch his vote from the Green Party’s Stein to another politician. First on his list is a promise to call for an immediate ceasefire and fighting the influence of the pro-Israel lobby and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee in Congress.

“This candidate would also ideally work toward pulling further away from the Israeli colonial project over time, with the goal being repealing our absurd financial support, ending the foreign interest agency of AIPAC, and pushing for a nation-wide boycott a la [South Africa] during their apartheid,” Dawson wrote.

The candidate would also have to push to reform the Supreme Court, he added. “The candidate would have to promise to both push for justice impeachment, and expand the courts,” Dawson said.“If a replacement candidate met both of these requirements, I would absolutely consider switching my vote from Jill Stein. Hell, I might even knock doors/canvass for them!”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 58 points 4 months ago (14 children)

Nothing is improved by Trump being elected; for Gazans , for Israelis, for Americans, or anyone else.

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 months ago

If Trump gets elected, he'd show Israel what real genocide looks like.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah anyone who is uncommitted because of Gaza, either was never gonna vote, or is lying to pollsters and is manipulating polls.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Which is why we need to run a candidate with a shot of beating trump...

It's too important of an election to let Joe have one more go out of nostalgia.

It would be easiest for everyone if he stepped aside, but he's not willing to.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

It blows my mind that people can argue that Trump is the worst possible outcome for our country and the world, and then follow that up with "we need a candidate that can beat Trump". If everyone knows what is at stake (democracy), how is Biden not capable of beating Trump? Do people think that not voting, or voting 3rd party is going to somehow keep Trump out of the white house? Anything but a vote for Biden (or whoever ends up on the ticket opposite Trump) is who everyone needs to vote for, or they have chosen Trump and doomed us all.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Do you think it's easier to convince 10s of millions of voter's minds?

Or get Joe Biden to understand that polls show people don't want him and that the best thing he can do to prevent trump is step aside.

Seriously.

[–] bobburger@fedia.io 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Please provide some evidence to support your claim that the best thing Biden can do to prevent Trump getting elected is to step aside.

[–] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The post-debate Data for Progress poll tested the odds of eight Democrats who have been floated as possible alternatives to Biden, including Vice President Kamala Harris and multiple Democratic governors. Biden’s self-proclaimed advantage is tempered by the lack of name recognition — so far — for the other options. Aside from Harris, prospective voters were so unfamiliar with these Democratic leaders that between 39 and 71 percent* *of respondents said they hadn’t heard enough about them to have an opinion. Even so, each potential candidate performed the same or even better than Biden.

From this article and Link to the poll

[–] bobburger@fedia.io 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You kind of buried the lede there:

Overall, these results show that voters continue to be concerned about Biden’s age — but there is not yet clear evidence that an alternative nominee would significantly outperform him against Trump in a head-to-head matchup.

That's evidence that some candidates poll similarly to Biden.

That's not evidence the best thing Biden can do to stop Trump from becoming president is drop out.

[–] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Didn’t really bury it because I don’t agree with that analysis and it’s not part of the poll.

If they’re polling similar to him with 39%-71% of the people not knowing who the candidate is that means their floor is where Biden is.

[–] bobburger@fedia.io 2 points 4 months ago (7 children)

...it's not part of the poll.

That quote comes directly from the poll you linked.

...that means their floor is where Biden is.

That's a specious conclusion you're jumping to because it supports your biases. With out more information it's more likely that once the respondents know who the candidates are the overall responses will fall in line with the population averages and the candidates polling results will be the same as they are now.

All we can confidently conclude for now is "39%-71% of people polled don't know who the candidates in the polls were".

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Ioughttamow@kbin.run 4 points 4 months ago

Something something, warm water ports

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Do you think anyone on this forum has a direct line to Biden?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jumjummy@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Oh look. Same person who shows up at any anti-Biden post trying to convince people not to vote for Biden, but stops just short of saying they want Trump to win.

Let’s see all your “genocide Joe” type of comments directed to all the GOP members in Congress who happily support Israel’s efforts.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 30 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Gaza is not on the ballot. Democracy is. End of discussion.

Gonna be a whole lot of Pikachu face on progressive faces.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Those progressive votes might come in handy. But if Democrats don't want to put it on the ballot they must be very confident in their victory.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In other words, people who are uncommitted at this stage are absolute morons.

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 months ago

And a danger to themselves and everybody else.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

What the fuck is wrong with people. Number one criteria for president is dealing with a small scale civil/proxy war.

Meanwhile in Sudan, Ukraine, China, Myanmar, etc. there are millions more people being killed/impacted by genocidal governments and these don't even make the list of anyone giving a shit when it comes to presidential choice.

Meanwhile the entire world economy is falling apart for the average person.

Meanwhile there's a drug epidemic (somewhat related to the last one) killing around 100,000 Americans a year.

If your number one criteria is the Palestinian war you are either Palestinian(totally okay) or you have no idea how to prioritize your life in a rational manner and should not be allowed to vote.

[–] Impound4017@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (14 children)

I think it should be pretty clear, right? It’s different because America is helping them commit genocide. It’s not like this is all happening separately from us and people are calling for some kind of foreign intervention, they’re asking that we stop helping the people doing a genocide.

That’s not to say it’s my only priority this election, but it’s definitely up there, because I, like many Americans, feel like I’m complicit to some degree.

Make no mistake, though, Trump would be far worse. I still know the score here, but I can understand why it ranks highly on people’s priorities.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't mind it being a priority, only it being the top criteria. Someone who says it's their most important priority displays a significant lack of awareness for what's happening in the country and in the world.

[–] Impound4017@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago

I take your point and agree, actually. Single issue voters are always a nuisance though, and these ones are nothing new.

Also worth noting that we similarly have blood on our hands for a lack of support for Ukraine. All that time that the US political system was bogged down and unable to send aid meant they had to pay the cost to hold the line in manpower instead, so I can understand the frustration.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

If your number one criteria is the Palestinian war you are either Palestinian(totally okay) or you have no idea how to prioritize your life in a rational manner and should not be allowed to vote

No longer will I need to wonder how the Germans let the Holocaust happen.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (12 children)

Do you think Palestine is in Europe?

And why are you calling a genocide a war? Because the victims have been resisting?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

During the debate Trump said that Israel would finish the job with him elected. In my eyes that's more/less try to eradicate the Palestinians.

.. how can there still be people who think not voting for Biden is a better bet for Gaza? Like really: open your eyes.

You'd prefer to either not vote, vote third party (throw your vote away), or vote for someone who has more or less said they'd continue to support killing innocent people.

Biden isn't great but is more likely to aim for a ceasefire and some sort of peace than Trump.

It's the lesser of evils.

.. of course voting for Trump is likely pushing the US towards fascism as well, but I'll ignore that for this (and him being a felon, accused rapist, advocate for the wealthy at the expense of all others, liar, etc) specific comment.

[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 months ago

“I’m going to show my anger by making things exponentially worse for myself! That’ll show them!”

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The choice between a kindly old man that's trying to get two sides that want war to agree to a ceasefire and a criminal, authoritarian, mean, and petty old man that will just tell one side to bomb the other into oblivion... civilian casualties be damned.

If people are "uncommitted" it's because they don't know what's going on.

[–] III@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

It's because they are liars and don't actually care about that issue at all. If they were truly concerned they would see the situation in front of them and make the only real logical choice.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

"We need to move to the right to pick up undecided voters"

"Undecided voters want to stop supporting Netanyahu's genocide."

"Man, fuck undecided voters. No one needs them. They're all morons. Let's ignore them and move to the right."

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

It's not that simple, if gaining undecided votes comes at the cost of more votes than they gain then you're not going to win. That has been the struggle of the Dems for decades on every progressive issue.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

those aren't the undecided votes we want

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Oh phew. I thought people were getting encumbered with all the rape, personal failings, inciting insurrection, misuse of campaign funds, misappropriation of state secrets, hypocrisy, bringing personal feelings and emoluments into state dealings, and being generally incompetent and other unlikeable things. Priorities, people! /s

load more comments
view more: next ›