this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
1141 points (98.9% liked)

Memes

45759 readers
977 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gnomesaiyan@lemmy.world 107 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Tax the rich
Feed the poor
Till there ain't no
Rich no more

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 45 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Incidentally, no
Poor no more
Either

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago (2 children)

What?!? But then how will I know who I'm BETTER than?!?

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I have a dream that we will one day live in a nation where we are judged not by the size of our bank account, but by the content of our character.

(Spoilers: we won't.)

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (5 children)

If you ever figure out where that nation is, let me know and I'll start packing.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

There are probably some small remote tribes/communes out there somewhere that follow this.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AShadyRaven@lemmy.zip 53 points 4 months ago (3 children)

i just want a small property with a yard and a couple trees and room to grow some plants and tinker on projects

if only i didn't spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on avocado toast in my 20s

[–] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Take a look at moneybags over here being able to afford avocado toast!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] volvoxvsmarla@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago

I just don't want to be homeless when I am old. That's all I want. Having food and housing. A two room apartment for me and my husband would be nice. If I can use the public transport on top of that, I'm all set. A three room apartment would be a luxury and being able to go out every once in a while would be absolutely astronomical.

(I also want to have healthcare but I am in Germany so I got that going for me which is nice. )

[–] SirDerpy@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Modest home. Stone fruit trees. Nice big pole barn for projects.

My wife and I have been searching for community and reasonable housing costs. My data analyst self began mad research of all sorts for about a year. Then, we moved into a vehicle and explored for eight months.

Boots on the ground, we learned that everything is much, much better if you're at least 40 minutes from the closest Walmart. This is harder than it seems. It'll likely be an hour+ commute to a workplace with decent pay. But, it's been consistently true wherever we've traveled (US): No Walmart nearby means a solid community and cheap land.

We found a place we like. My wife accepted a job offer today. We bought a 14' enclosed utility trailer and will build a temporary home in the two weeks before we leave, avoiding rent and mortgage until we find the perfect piece of land.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 46 points 4 months ago (8 children)

We can, but it requires not having billionaires.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 4 months ago (3 children)

No more billionaires, but everyone can be a millionaire.

The shortest path to equality is to greatly reduce taxes on the middle class and increase them on the wealthy.

It puzzles me why leftist parties don't all embrace lower taxes for the middle class.

[–] SirDerpy@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

It puzzles me why leftist parties don't all embrace lower taxes for the middle class.

They all do. My best guess as to why you'd say this is that you're including Democrats.

edit: Or, I could be a self-centered American that didn't consider others. I'll do better.

At risk of a strawman...

The shortest path to equality is to greatly reduce taxes on the middle class and increase them on the wealthy.

That's what's best for equality and for economic growth. Does this mean Democrats are horribly incompetent? Perhaps it's that equality and economic growth aren't their goals.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's also possible they're not from the US. There are dozens of us. Dozens!

[–] SirDerpy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Fuck. I'm being a self-centered American, again. I'll do better in the future. Thanks for the help.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

It puzzles me why leftist parties don't all embrace lower taxes for the middle class.

Functionally, we don't have one. The closest is the Green Party, but they're so powerless that they may as well not exist.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A lot of leftist view taxes as a good thing, when taken from those who can afford them

[–] classic@fedia.io 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Taxes have never been the issue. How they are used is. But that gets obfuscated so that the 99% shoot ourselves in the foot

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 36 points 4 months ago

If you live in a society where you work a 40 hour week and you STILL can't afford basic things like shelter, food, utilities and healthcare, then the rich are stealing too goddamn much from you.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 32 points 4 months ago (16 children)
[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I doubt that number takes into account corruption.

It also doesn't account for corporate price gouging or the fact that the only reason people go hungry in the world is because letting them starve is more profitable than feeding them even the leftovers and about-to-go-off.

As well as what you said, theres also no reason not the presume the number could be much lower too.

[–] mrmetaverse@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago

Man if I had forty million bands i'd do it. Just rip off the bandaid. The world would be a better place.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 28 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I want wealth to be an indicator of a well-rounded member of society, instead of its current role as a proxy for sociopathy.

Also, how about relabelling excessive financial accumulation as something along the lines of ‘financial obesity’.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Obesity used to be a sign of wealth, and confer higher social status. So oligarchs would be introduced as "the biggest, the fattest, the most corpulent of them all, Richie Apartheington!"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Nah I definitely want both. My current hobbies are expensive. My dream hobby of getting a pilots license and a small plane would be really expensive.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 25 points 4 months ago

So you want the freedom of getting a pilots license and a small plane.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

What if you used that plane every so often to fly others around? Or perhaps you share it with others like a time share?

It feels like there's an answer here. I'm just spit balling, though. I'm not even fully against capitalism, I'm just kind of tired of... Well... All the billionaires and dramatic wealth inequality.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sircac@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Trying to get rich is the selfish version of “every man for himself”, building a more equal society is the empathetic one: in a fair society there are no threats to seek your own life.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

To each for his ability; from each as much as we can take

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 15 points 4 months ago (5 children)
[–] AlolanYoda@mander.xyz 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sounds deep but isn't

Title of your sex tape

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] explodIng_lIme@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I just want freedom period. If that means being rich then I guess I’ll do that

[–] rivvvver@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 4 months ago (8 children)

what if it means taking other ppls freedom away from them in the process?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CyberMonkey404@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 months ago

I mean, yeah. That's pretty much it

[–] BleakBluets@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (3 children)

It's interesting how this scene was constructed. The blacksmiths and their table never appear outside except when guiding the one lost blacksmith back home. The old man is usually sleeping in the bar mumbling about his lost son (flute boy) until the pre-credits end sequence where they are reunited in the forest. The text boxes normally have a transparent background, but here it's a darkened floor tile from Sahasrahla's hut.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Even more more puzzling is how the imagery has absolutely nothing to do with the message. Like Dr. Manhattan Bobby on the moon complaining about capitalism.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 months ago (20 children)

Not sure what your point is old man, but I can't get the freedom that the rich enjoy without being rich.

Deluding myself into a state of bliss when the mortgage is due doesn't help anyone, especially me.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Op discovers fiat currency.

load more comments
view more: next ›