this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
123 points (99.2% liked)

NASA's Curiosity Mars Rover

313 readers
13 users here now

A lemmy community for scientific discussion of the Curiosity Rover and Mars Science Laboratory.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

It's had a tough journey, but it's still trucking

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] youngalfred@lemm.ee 26 points 2 months ago (3 children)

That's incredible that a) it's had that much damage and b) it's still going!
Any estimates on lifespan left of the wheel/tyre?

[–] atocci@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I read an article a while back that said JPL estimates critical wheel damage (14 out of the 19 treads snapping) to occur around 2034. That won't be the end of the rover though, they have a plan. Once damage passes that point of no return, they'll deliberately snap off the inner two thirds of the wheel and keep going on just the stronger outer third. https://spectrum.ieee.org/if-necessary-mars-rover-curiosity-could-rip-its-own-wheels-off-to-stay-mobile

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The people working on this are truly incredible. I'm always extremely happy to read about these kinds of endeavors - so many people can do incredible things when given the time and funding.

[–] ilovededyoupiggy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

I can barely plan what I'm gonna wear today, and these guys figured out how their wheels would fail, when their wheels would fail, and how they're gonna fix them, 25 years in advance, and on a different planet.

[–] paulhammond5155@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Several years ago they did an engineering study that basically stated that when a specific number of cleats broke it had used up a percentage of its life. We're past that stage now. They have since developed a scenario that will allow them to rip one half of the damaged wheel off, and still drive on the remaining half.... All of the wheels are motorized, losing one wheel won't stop the rover from traversing to it's science waypoints

[–] Kiwi_fella@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Scientists approve of littering on another planet."

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be fair the scientific ideal is to one day recover it to be placed in a museum.

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

It's not garbage when it's on a podium

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Other than weight, why isn’t the wheel solid? Seems like a safer bet for a rover, and you don’t have passenger comfort to take into account.

[–] atocci@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I have a hard time imagining it's for any reason other than weight.

[–] paulhammond5155@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

why isn’t the wheel solid?

  • Weight is an issue
  • The wheels were the rover shock absorbers during landing (by the sky-crane back in 2012)
  • Yes, no passenger comfort, but there is an amount of sensitive electronics and instruments to protect.