this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
404 points (98.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7228 readers
174 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Full text of statement:

"It should come as no great surprise that a Democratic Party which has abandoned working class people would find that the working class has abandoned them. First, it was the white working class, and now it is Latino and Black workers as well. While the Democratic leadership defend the status quo, the American people are angry and want change. And they're right.

Today, while the very rich are doing phenomenally well, 60% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck and we have more income and wealth inequality than ever before. Unbelievably, real, inflation-accounted-for weekly wages for the average American worker are actually lower now than they were 50 years ago.

Today, despite an explosion in technology and worker productivity, many young people will have a worse standard of living than their parents. And many of them worry that Artificial Intelligence and robotics will make a bad situation even worse.

Today, despite spending far more per capita than other countries, we remain the only wealthy nation not to guarantee health care to all as a human right and we pay, by far, the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs. We, alone among major countries, cannot even guarantee paid family and medical leave.

Today, despite strong opposition from a majority or Americans, we continue to spend billions funding the extremist Netanyahu government's all out war against the Palestinian people which has led to the horrific humanitarian disaster of mass malnutrition and the starvation of thousands of children.

While the big money interests and well paid consultants who control the Democratic Party learn any real lessons from this disastrous campaign? Will they understand the pain and political alienation that tens of millions of Americans are experiencing? Do they have any ideas as to how we can take on the increasingly powerful Oligarchy which has so much political power? Probably not.

In the coming weeks and months those of us concerned about grassroots democracy and economic justice need to have some very serious political discussions.

Stay tuned."

(page 2) 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

kinda doubt they care overmuch as theyre making money either way

[–] coolusername@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Maybe releasing a video begging people to overlook genocide and vote for the cop wasn't very smart of you bro.

[–] SquatDingloid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

GenZ had pretty much no impact on this election, the younger demographics all showed up in the same ratios they always do.

This election was lost by the dems because they assumed white Neoliberal men would vote for a woman

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I guess everyone’s got their pet theory for why the Dems lost, even though all the votes aren’t in yet, never mind any scientific analysis of them.

[–] SquatDingloid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

We already have the numbers lol

Proportionally no more young people voted than last time

And white men are the group that didn't vote at the same rate as last time

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com -1 points 2 weeks ago

If they are going to ram through protectionist type tarrifs and similar laws they should just make it federal law that US Pharma companies legally can't sell drugs to any other nations health system for a penny less than what they charge any uninsured US citizen. We currently are in effect subsidizing systems like Canada or Britain's NHS. The companies use our framework to develop and bring drugs to market, charge the US citizen (or their Rx plan) full freight while other systems get a negotiated lower price. Canadians and Brits should be defraying the development cost of expensive drugs by the US, rather than simply benefiting from them.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 weeks ago

So they picked the worst possible option? That doesn't even make sense. I doubt he would have won either at the time, even if he wasn't sabotaged. Do you think the RNC wouldn't have gone after him worse?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›