this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
86 points (87.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26980 readers
1477 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 80 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Dictatorships are built on narratives. To stop them one must break their narrative, which is an iterative process—they’ll change the narrative to explain away new developments, but if you force them to keep making changes faster than their adherents can absorb them, their shared reality will fall apart.

[–] WeUnite@lemm.ee 26 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I feel this is really the most important answer here. We must break the false narratives that they use to hold power.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] f43r05@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago

Ding Ding Ding! This right here. Unfortunately, they say one thing one day, and the opposite the other, and know their followers will latch onto the answer they want to believe/be true. It is exactly how religions work too.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

They've given up on narratives and now say lots of conflicting things to overload your brain.

[–] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Klear@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Username checks out.

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 66 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

after all other options are exhausted civil disobedience is the only thing left

examples would include handing about abortion pills in illegal states

[–] WeUnite@lemm.ee 10 points 6 days ago

Yes, this makes sense! Hopefully while doing so one could build a coalition that includes more and more people.

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)

According to the german constitution germans are not only allowed but required to kill unelected heads of government.

Although I'm Swiss, I would do the same. Every Swiss person has to enter the Military and it's a societal contract that our militia is there to keep the democracy alive.

[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A lot of authoritarian governments are/were elected though.

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

yeah, but the Moment they change the laws into "only we can get elected" they are a legitimate target

[–] PortugalSpaceMoon@infosec.pub 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

*Every Swiss male has to enter the military unless unable or unwilling to.

No Swiss person has to enter the military.

I'd also like to see proof of the first claim. Germany's Grundgesetz Art. 20 (4) gives the right to oppose but doesn't require it.

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yes and no. Every Swiss male has to serve in the military. You are allowed to compensate for it instead, but there is still a Wehrpflicht, that doesn't change. Just that the compensation is Part of the Wehrpflicht.

[–] DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You can also be arbitrarily deemed "unfit for service" and forced to pay a pretty expensive compensation fee for the next several years, even if you would have preferred to have done the months of military or year of civil service instead.

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

you can't anymore actually. There was a ruling of the Europäischer Menschenrechtsgerichtshof (I think that's how it's called?) (not the one of the EU but the one of the European Council) that that was discriminatory and they legally have to allow everyone to serve.

It was in an official document on the official website (I think of the Kanton Luzern?), so it certainly isn't a fake. I can possibly find it for you again if you want to.

Edit: can't find the official Document, but here you go: https://www.srf.ch/news/schweiz/europaeischer-gerichtshof-wehrpflichtersatz-diskriminiert-gesundheitlich-untaugliche

In the second paragraph they talk about what I just said.

[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Join the resistance. Evil must be opposed.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

For now I just donated to a group opposing the Christian national takeover of our institutions. If Trump decides to actually go for dictatorship there will be a resistance.

[–] greencactus@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

In my opinion, it depends on the kind of dictatorship and your status of power. I assume that you're an average US american looking at the election rn - then there isn't really anything we can do here. The system is simply too strong, and Donald Trump has too much institutional authority to be stopped.

However, I ask you to keep in mind that dictatorship isn't an authoritarian monolith and that we as common citizens have a possibility to influence and undermine authoritarian governments. Nazi Germany immediately comes to mind; many citizens disobeyed the government, may have leaked information or sabotaged important projects, even into the highest ranks (Stauffenberg and Schindler are prime examples). A dictatorship is only as effective as the bearers of power in a certain region. For example, police officers, but also common citizens (just keep in mind that a significant amount of Germans provided shelter for Jewish people).

It seems from my perspective that the authoritarian train cannot be stopped. So I'd do my best now to prepare for what is to come. Educate yourself about the key political players in your concrete region, if you decide to stay. Understand who holds the essential components of power - the council, the police officers, school district. Who supplies the common goods? Especially local producers often are connected strongly to the people and can be a major influence in the region. With this knowledge, you will be able to in turn exercise influence yourself and be able to help yourself and people who will be victims of Project 2025. We have a certain strength here - we know what it coming. Many people don't. Use this knowledge for the good. Even if you cannot stop a "global" transition to the authoritarian regime which is to come, you can mitigate its effects on the local community by participating and influencing the bearers of decisions.

I hope it makes sense. If you disagree, feel free to reply - I'd love to get more input on this topic. If any further questions arise, don't hesitate to ask :)

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And when/how would you know it was time to do this thing you're ready to do?

[–] Makhno@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You wouldn't. Everyone would keep being brainwashed into accepting reality. It's happening now.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Sorry, couldn't hear you over the sound of the boiling water in this pot

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 22 points 6 days ago (3 children)

A year ago I was unemployed and single. My answer then would have been considerably different than now. I'm much happier with my life but the world is now much worse off and I'm currently struggling to reconcile my radical progressive views with the desire for a comfortable life. I'm still strongly of the opinion that our society (in the US at least) is beyond repair, but I'm less eager to see the reset button pressed. I'm fortunate to be in a blue state (though like all blue states, it gets real red outside the city limits), so my plan at the moment is to pretend the federal government doesn't exist.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Similar boat. I'm climbing out of a pit of 10 year of shit luck and painful life events. I've been getting glimpses of the good life and was starting to accept my progress and recognize how far things had come. My trajectory was success. Now I have 4+ years of bullshit to look forward to and even if the dems win the next time, they've shown they won't, can't, don't know how to wield that power effectively.

My partner has an adult dependent who now lives with us and it is going to put a wrench into the wheels of our own plan to leave for overseas where we want to start a family somewhere where it is affordable and they are less likely to be victimized or murdered at school and will actually learn something. This would not be such a big deal as we make a good family, but staring down the barrel of this red white and blue idiocracy, the barriers to leaving feel like a sledgehammer to the face.

To your last point, I'm moderately happy with my state government though my municipality is Religious, MAGA, Jesusland, hell. I used to wish for revolution or huge social change as a kid, but as an adult I realize that we all need to change our own hearts and start treating each other with respect. Institutions can be changed, but it has to happen from the bottom up through individual actions (or intentional lack of action). Top down always results in tyranny. That's why this education domino is going to hurt so bad. People won't learn how to think anymore, just what to think, and they'll be monitored closely from the day they are born to the day they die. Still holding out hope though.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

as an adult I realize that we all need to change our own hearts and start treating each other with respect

As a kid I believed that cooperation and mutual respect would lead us down the path to a wonderful future. I believed very strongly in the power of love and good sense. I still think this is true but the world has proven to me, brutally and repeatedly, that we don't live in an environment of cooperation and mutual respect.

As an adult, I'm done treating conservatives with respect. One-sided respect and attempts at compromise is what got us into this nightmare hellscape to begin with. Respect is earned, not given. And I refuse to respect those who will not reciprocate it.

"Meet me in the middle, says the unjust man. You take a step towards him, he takes a step back. Meet me in the middle, says the unjust man."

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I just have to continue reminding myself that people somehow continued to live happy, fulfilling lives during the fall of the Roman Empire.

[–] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

It’s because they still had the trebuchet, long may it reign!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

At least 30,000,000 people protesting non violently for a year, hoping no war will erupt. This might help

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Protesting" isn't what we need. We need them running for office, whether that is president, senator, congressperson, or even for the local school board: a lot of those lower officers will move up over time.

Just like the remnants of the Tea Party took over the GOP, we need a "Guillotine Party" to redirect the Democrats to focus on the robber baron billionaire class.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WeUnite@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago

Yes, if that many people would do that it could make a huge difference

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 6 days ago (5 children)

If you mean the current US election, absolutely nothing. Americans need to suffer at least for a short while to truly understand what they have done. Once the American people are willing to accept reason then any method of resistance from civil disobedience to revolution becomes acceptable.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 43 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Americans need to suffer at least for a short while to truly understand what they have done.

Americans need to suffer at least for a short while

to truly understand that they are victims of a deeply, deeply flawed electoral system that can only result in fascism in its current state.

FTFY

polarization is a feature not a bug in FPTP elections.  UK will lose NHS for the same reason.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago

I'm not as optimistic about that as you are. The average person only knows what they're told and as long as the right controls the narrative in their homes they're going to think 'liberals' and 'illegals' and 'trans' are causing their pain, no matter how bad it gets.

Maybe some pain is what they need to snap out of this, but they also need a trusted voice to tell them the truth about who is doing it to them. Right now that person doesn't exist in a vast swath of American homes.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

Suffering people vote for authoritarians.

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago

If history is repeated isn't it more likely that it results in a one party nation that isn't taken down unless a foreign country intervenes militarily?

These type of movements seem to lean towards one that as reflective of what the people of the country want with the initial stages more downplaying people's worst criticisms until power is successfully seized from all corners of that country's government.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 13 points 6 days ago

You say that as if dictators, by their nature, aren't going to sneak up on us. The question, sadly, should be what we would do once one reveals themselves, and the answer to that is in a battle of wit VS law.

I read the question as "why would you stop a transition to a dictatorship," and the answer to that is to stop a transition to a dictatorship. Like, duh.

But for real, I don't really have the answers. Things aren't that dire yet where I live, but the best time to start on mutual aid is yesterday - and the second best time is today.

[–] helmet91@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

I guess, it depends on the dictatorship. For example if it's the one being formed in the US currently, here are some ideas: https://theintercept.com/2024/11/14/trump-agenda-organize-protest-movement/

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago

Nope, not today, glowie.

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 6 points 6 days ago

I would like to think a lot of sacrifices for the sake of my "fellows".

Realistically some mild ineffective activism with a whole lot of hiding because I'm not responsible for the idiots that let the situation get there in the first place.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›