this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
1825 points (98.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

5903 readers
3143 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BendingHawk@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I hate to say this, but PRIVACY IS DEAD... Atleast online... Unless, you are an IT expert and been using VPNs since 2001.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

it died a long time ago

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think there's some confusion at play here. That argument is about security, not privacy.

Is the concern that Microsoft is ingesting your data and thus your actions aren't private? Or is it that Windows is not secure and so you don't think data stored in Windows systems is safe from third party access? That distinction matters, because in both cases the way it's framed here isn't really accurate but for different reasons.

[–] fraksken@infosec.pub 8 points 5 days ago (9 children)

And both arguments are valid. However, when discussing privacy with somebody "who has nothing to hide", the security concerns argument usually holds more ground.

"Fine, you don't mind microsoft and their 961 partners to know about your computer usage patterns. But how about the criminals which will have your data as well? You may trust microsoft with your data - "because they have it already" - but do you trust each of these 961 partners? Do you trust all their privacy policies? I have read some. They are horrendus and allow sharing with third parties. Do you trust their privacy and security?"

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Grail@aussie.zone 8 points 4 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Maybe we should tell people to use Linux

[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's why I demand (nag constantly) that everyone around me run Linux 🤣

Jk we're all doomed to live in an Orwellian dystopia

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 days ago

(me screaming at the gas station attendant from behind the bulletproof glass)

BRO CHANGE YOUR OS!

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

My wife and I just had this conversation a couple days ago where she pointed out that she has all the same documents as me on her computer and she uses Windows. I had to acknowledge that was definitely a hole in my privacy, so we concluded the conversation with the decision that she will start using Linux too. But you're right, the solution needs to be bigger.

[–] tekato@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Using Linux does not make you safe either. Given that almost every server runs Linux, you can bet good money that most intelligence agencies have a few full time employees adding backdoors to the kernel XZ Utils style, and at least one of them has succeeded.

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

True, but I'm a betting man and I bet that the US intelligence agency is so deep in Microsoft that Linux looks totally free and clear by comparison.

[–] Wildly_Utilize@infosec.pub 2 points 3 days ago

Well they were first in line to participate in PRISM so yeah safe bet

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›