this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

40329 readers
431 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi there,

Filerun will stop exisiting as a free version and since I use it like once a month for some small files I was wondering what similar selfhostable and free alternatives are out there that you know.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] outcide@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I keep not getting around to trying it, but KaraDAV looks great. Lightweight WebDAV server which supports Next/OwnCloud clients for syncing.

[–] decta@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

After a while I found https://github.com/stonith404/pingvin-share/tree/main which does all I need. So if you are still in search of a filerun alternative give Pingvin-share a try.

[–] Nulubez@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Might I suggest a Synology NAS. They're a network attached storage, sure, but they have a suite of apps including DS files, DS photos, etc. It also can act as a VPN too. Just a thought

[–] sneakyninjapants@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Filerun will stop exisiting as a free version

I suspected that was going to happen eventually. Being closed-source is part of the reason I dropped it.

  • Filerun
    • Worked well while I was using it, not a fan of the closed-source nature and just didn't feel the need to redeploy when I retooled my infrastructure.

Probably the most direct replacement I can think of is Filebrowser.

[–] rambos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Filebrowser? It is awesome, but thats not a cloud, thats just a file browser for your server in a web app

[–] crunziel@lemmy.id 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i read owncloud infinite scale (OCIS) few days ago, i wanted to try it this weekend, and if you’re looking just only file sharing, this might fit for you,

or nextcloud docker / nextcloud install with redis and tuning, and remove the features you don’t need

[–] decta@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

I was thinking about nextcloud or owncloud, but all I actually need is the fileshare function. This seems a little much overhead for just that. If I won’t find anything I will more or less bite that bullet and use nextcloud, but would love to have a standalone solution. Thanks for the input tho – did not know about OCIS yet, will check it out.

[–] irreducible12302@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're looking for just filesharing capabilities, OwnCloud might be a good alternative. It's recently been rewritten in Go and its supposedly quite fast. I must say that I haven't used it myself.

Another alternative could be Nextcloud, but that comes with a whole suite of other software such as calendar, contacts, ...

I've also heard some good things about seafile, but never used it myself either.

[–] homegrowntechie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You can disable the majority of the extra apps on Nextcloud to strip it down. It runs fine on lower end devices once tuned properly.

load more comments
view more: next ›