this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
1 points (52.6% liked)

Canada

7273 readers
416 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No.

Why are we listening to what some American economist has to say? It's a public service, not a business. It's not there to make money. It costs money to deliver packages to remote locations, which Canada has plenty of.

Comparing Canada to UK, Belgium or Germany is nonsensical, as they don't have similar geography or population density.

[–] bitwise@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 day ago

Manufactured consent masquerading as news.

[–] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

Ask people in the UK well how privatization of services is working out for them 🀑. Privatization of public services is the rich stealing from everyone else

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey CBC, if Canada Post gets privatized you may be next.

[–] healthetank@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did you read the article? They talk about this one guy who says they should be privatized, then go on to talk about why that isn't feasible or the problems those examples are already having with their privatized systems, including the drastically different population density. Its pretty clearly a "this doesnt make sense to do" article, even ending with "who would even want to buy it"

[–] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Its pretty clearly a β€œthis doesnt make sense to do” article, even ending with β€œwho would even want to buy it”

Good points but it isn't at all clear based on the headline, and there are other ways they could have phrased the headline. I've seen several pro-Freeland CBC headlines with articles that don't really back the headline up lately. I have a hypothesis that curating headlines may be a way higher up editors can apply the spin the even higher-ups tell them to while authors have more independence in the content of article. More people might read the headline than the article. To be clear, I don't know any of this is true, but my trust in mainstream news to do journalism versus PR is at an all-time low after the last year (e.g., US election, ethnic cleansing of Palestine)

[–] Frederic@beehaw.org 10 points 1 day ago

No, and I don't like people saying Canada Post lose millions per year, it's a service, like the military, do we say Canadian Forces are losing 40 billions per year?

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago
[–] jlow@beehaw.org 7 points 1 day ago

Of course not.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Betteridge's Law of Headlines in full effect