It's a lot to go through, the biggest one yet. Personally, I'm thrilled that they backed off from requiring templates for Druid's Wild Shape, but still feel some type of way they're now limiting your number of known forms. I sort of understand it, but I don't love it.
this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)
Dungeons & Dragons
6 readers
1 users here now
A community for discussion of the various iterations of the Dungeons & Dragons tabletop roleplaying game. **Related Communities:**
-
- rpgmemes@ttrpg.network **Lists of related magazines:**
-
- List of ttrpg network magazines **Mod note** I took over this magazine because it was abandoned. Aside from updating the sidebar I don't have any plans. Apply for moderator if you want to breathe some life into this magazine. Send me a message if there is a moderation issue because kbin currently does not send notifications on a report.
founded 1 year ago
They got rid of the Elemental Forms too, right?
I posted the same pdf 10 minutes before you, it makes no sense to have duplicate topics so I deleted mine.
On the Druid:
They reverted most of the structural changes to the Druid, and buffed it a bit.
It feels more well rounded, not only focussed on wildshape.
Aw I'm sorry! I didn't see it but there was a short gap between when I looked and when I posted, my bad.
I definitely do appreciate the variety of things they're introducing that you can utilize in place of Wild Shape. It's interesting that with that, they reverted from calling it expending a use of Channel Nature back to expending a use of Wild Shape, which makes a little less sense IMO.
No problem, it was indeed a short gap.
I loved Channel Nature as a name, I'm sad they reverted to wildshape. But for the rest It's a pretty cool druid for a caster.
rad, thank you for posting. I’m only just stumbling through this now!
view more: next ›