this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37738 readers
403 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I just wanted to hear what everyone's thoughts are on Apple's new product line coming out in 2024. Will this be the new iPad/iPhone? While the price is certainly prohibitive, from what I can tell from the keynote and promo, it really does seem like the real deal; a different way of interacting 'in space.' I think this is the step in the right direction for AR/VR to be more mainstream.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] natarey@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The AR stuff is what I've wanted since the first Oculus dropped -- being able to remove all the obvious parts of technology from my physical spaces (the multiple monitors, the computer tower, all the cables and whatnot) in favor of a thing I put on my head and do real work? Yes please. Fuck gaming -- I want my life back, and to have work shoved off into a weird phantom realm where I don't have to think about or look at it when I'm off the clock.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They are betting on it being the next big thing, but I don't think it is. One side note the images shows clear googles, I'm pretty sure their model has no clear through vision, isn't it a black opaque front with camera? So if battery dies you lose external vision. For a product to take off it has to fill a use-case and a buyer's need. Why is wearing a goggle needed, it is cumbersome and limited. Workplace use woyld be fatiguing. Google Glass had a better idea (you could interact with the world normal and have AR as a bonus. The cost of apple product is also a barrier to many, and so you would get poor people with no access to functions. Just seems like they will share the fate of Metas AR googles.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think that might actually be an external screen.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So outsiders see your face from inside?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah. I guess two screens was easier to make work than one dual-purpose window-screen.

[–] ymylt301@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Iirc it is an external screen yes.

Its an extremely niche product, just look at the price alone, it will prevent if from taking off

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

That's how it should work. If anyone can sell an objectively stupid tech gadget, though, it's Apple.

[–] doxxx@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

The problem with see through AR glasses is that the actual VR view looks like ass because the tech to do it well is not there yet.