Haven't we been giving puberty blockers to children with precocious puberty for a while now? Doesn't that cohort represent a much larger clinical study than trans children?
But we all know why they're doing this. Not exactly a mystery.
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)
LGBTQ+
6199 readers
6 users here now
All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.
See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC
Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Well, they actually care about cis kids. Trans kids can just fuck right off.
It's so frustrating. I just want to live my life in peace, why are trans people constantly in the news, why are we constantly targeted ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ
Yes, and this presents a large problem. Essentially, puberty blockers can be prescribed to cis kids for precocious puberty, but not trans kids for gender affirmation. The medical provider has to make sure the kid is not trans for the medication to be legal to prescribe.
There's really no way to look at it aside from trans genocide, but that's to be expected from TERF island.
Yes; this is especially annoying because there is evidence, and it's good, but motivated gatekeepers have put the goalposts roughly into the orbit of Pluto.
but what is being done about the excessive wait times for people to even get an assessment?
as i understand: nothing. maybe if Keir Starmer wins the next election it'll eventually get better, but he's not been too promising on queer rights either from what i've seen in headlines.
The good law project is appealing their lawsuit: https://actions.goodlawproject.org/healthcare_delays_appeal
So much of how this clinic gets about terfs is so unhinged and (surprise) absolute disinformation, it's wild. We get a lot of comments on this side of the world about how we should stop the work we're doing because look at Tavistock, while the Cass report actually recommends the model we have in my region (ie care available in the community in partnership with primary care teams)