this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
405 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19148 readers
2052 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The New York State Board of Elections is opting to wait for the courts to rule on the eligibility of former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, signaling that the board would be open to taking his name off state ballots.

In a November 3 letter, the NYSBOE informed U.S. District Judge Glenn Suddaby that the state agency is taking "no position" in the matter of Trump's candidacy and that it will "abide by any orders of judgements of the court."

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 86 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The best case scenario for everybody (except maybe Trump) is if Trump was removed from the primary ballots in every state.

Trump doesn't want to do the job. He didn't even try to do the job the last time he had it. At this point, his main reason for running is to stay out of prison.

[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

And money. It was the most lucrative business his family ever run.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Pretty sure he wants to become a full on dictator

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Only because he now realizes it’s possible. I think his main reason is that he thinks losing anything makes him weak and he wants to prove he’s not weak. Trump has only ever really cared about one thing: his image. Even his personal freedom and money come second to that, I’d bet.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Strange legacy to become a dictator an such an advanced age that you'll inevitably die soon after. There's no guarantee that even if Trump is elected in 2024 that he'd make it to 2028, since he's unusually unhealthy.

[–] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don’t know that there is a best case for “everybody” at this point.

If Trump is blocked from running we will be hearing from his cult for the rest of time - and they will turn around and try to do this to others as payback (like they are doing with impeachment).

If Trump dies of a heart attack he becomes a martyr.

I think the best case is that he looses the primary. This might keep the Rs together as a party (sigh) but at least it will be their choice and maybe we can all move forward from there.

If Trump looses on the general we have another round of sore losers whining and trying to destroy democracy some more. Regardless of how that fight goes every day of it diminishes the country and boost in intensity would be bad.

If he wins the general election the country is SO very fucked — welcome to your new authoritarian apartheid anti-freedom etc state. At least that is their stated goal and it’s gonna be a horrible country damaging battle.

All of this is Rs and Trumps (MAGAs) fault. And they’re continuing to take the initiatives. I don’t have a broad strategy in mind so I’m ok with fighting them at each of these levels.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

If Trump is blocked from running we will be hearing from his cult for the rest of time - and they will turn around and try to do this to others as payback (like they are doing with impeachment).

Yes, I think this is the best case scenario. The 14th Amendment is actually upheld. One of the other GOP candidates get to win the primary. This is their best outcome. The MAGA public gets to continue to whine and complain, which is clearly what they want more than anything. The Democrats get to win the election over the demoralized MAGA crowd. And everybody, whether MAGA or sane, gets to benefit from having competent politicians running the federal government.

I think the best case is that he looses the primary.

Yes, it is almost the same as my best case. The big difference to me, and I think this is important, is that the US Constitution is actually followed in my best case scenario.

A lot of liberals think the best case scenario is for Trump to lose in the general election. This seems like the third best outcome to me.

I agree with you that we absolutely don't want Trump to die. I think that would be a worst case scenario. I actually think that the best overall scenario (not just talking about the election now) is if the Dems keep the WH and Senate, and take over the House, however that happens, and that Trump lives quite a long time. Because Trump has been amazing at reducing the number of young people who become Republican. The longer he's alive, but out of power, the weaker the GOP becomes, long term.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If Trump is blocked from running we will be hearing from his cult for the rest of time

It doesn't matter what happens we will be hearing from them for the rest of time.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No shit. Idk how op can even pretend it's a factor.
They can't do anything except vote. Get over them.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think him dying from a heart attack will not make him a martyr. He eats like shit and is in poor shape. Not everyone would believe it, but not so many that would be a problem. Like the dude is in the age bracket where it could happen and not be too surprising.

[–] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you underestimate his how many would believe. I don’t think MAGA types care about facts or health related statistics — all of which are signs of the liberal elite. Given the chance I think they’d make a martyr out of him just for spite.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Oh I don't underestimate them. However I don't think they will convince their children. Thus martyrism would be not possible for me.

[–] Wenchette@lemmy.ml 50 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I predict he will ultimately not be removed from any ballot in any state, even if the Supreme Court has to intervene.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

even if the Supreme Court has to intervene.

You're absolutely right, and it would a total reversal of the courts conservative movement towards states rights.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not when you consider 'states rights' was just code for 'gop power.'

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

AlwaysHasBeen.jpg

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It doesn't matter. The rules are whatever Roberts shits out of his mouth.

[–] PizzasDontWearCapes@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there a chance that he'd win any of the states that are threatening to take him off the ballot?

Are there any other repercussions (other than not getting votes) to being excluded from some state ballots?

[–] Borderpatrol1987@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

If removed from a swing state or a tradional GOP state, makes it harder to get enough electoral college votes.

[–] NECRO_PASTORAL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

He also could never win NY

Especially if. And really, you could take him off the ballot in many places (non-swing state) and have little effect.

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

This is the least newsworthy article ever. Literally everyone would abide by a court order to remove him or otherwise abide by the laws to include him if he meets the qualifications.

seems like a pretty optimistic take for 'we're waiting for everyone else to decide first'

[–] Hedup@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does this really matter? Are not the swing states the ones that actually decide the president?

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Would likely hurt republican down ballot candidates as presumably a lot of trump voters that would have gone straight ticket will just skip the vote altogether.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Still would deny him Electoral College votes from those states. So yes, it counts.

[–] kale@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 year ago

I don't think NY splits electoral votes. To get any NY electoral votes, he'd have to carry the whole state.

Will this leave him off the ballot for the primary? He is expected to win the primary and this will pump the numbers for another GOP candidate. If enough states do this, it could give the convention the cover to select someone else.

[–] kingshrubb@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It won't make much of a difference if only states that would vote Democrat anyway take him off the ballot.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 year ago

If enough do, that could give one of Trump’s republican rivals momentum in Trump states.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Not if it’s a primary ballot

[–] loopedcandle@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 year ago

Think of the down ballot races. When tiny hands orange man isn't on the ballot, how many MAGA Rs stay home b.c. their cult leader isn't there? It would majorly shift the non-presidential races.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


In a November 3 letter, the NYSBOE informed U.S. District Judge Glenn Suddaby that the state agency is taking "no position" in the matter of Trump's candidacy and that it will "abide by any orders of judgements of the court."

The lawsuit challenging Trump's candidacy in New York is one of 27 that have been filed across the country by John Anthony Castro, a long-shot presidential candidate who argues Trump should be disqualified from running for president under the 14th Amendment because of his role in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot.

The constitutional clause in question bars individuals from holding public office if they have "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" against the United States.

"The evidence shows that Castro has not campaigned in New Hampshire or elsewhere," said U.S. District Court Judge Joseph Laplante.

On Wednesday, the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled against a separate petition to keep Trump off the state's primary ballot, while leaving the door open for another challenge should the former president eventually become the Republican nominee in the general election.

"There is no state statute that prohibits a major political party from placing on the presidential nomination primary ballot, or sending delegates to the national convention supporting, a candidate who is ineligible to hold office," the ruling states, adding that "because there is no error to correct here as to the presidential nomination primary...the petition must be dismissed."


The original article contains 501 words, the summary contains 233 words. Saved 53%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

As well they should. Not that he had any chance of winning there anyway, but it's the right thing to do regardless.