this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
469 points (88.9% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29104 readers
3 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages πŸ”₯

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations πŸ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I loved Reddit for what it is, but nothing made me back out of a post faster than seeing the top 3 parent threads as a regurgitation of the same inside jokes, pun-chains, and so on.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Barrelephants@lemmy.world 150 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Glad to see one of the first posts I see on here is whining about how other people post. Starting to feel like home already.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 97 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Don't worry! We'll develop our own new inside jokes to repeat and nauseum!

EDIT: I realized, 4 hours later, than auto-correct had changed "ad" to "and". I'm leaving it as it makes this comment even more obnoxious.

[–] 314xel@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Definitely! We have our own social network, with baccarat and masseuses!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] akvomelono@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

first new inside joke: and nauseam πŸ’€

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dialecticcake@lemmy.world 86 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

I think it's natural to want the majority of posts to meet one's preferences but what one finds interesting/entertaining/etc. varies for each person.

I love diversity and choice and so I'm happy that each community can have their own individual rules/cultures and we can pick which communities we want to join. E.g., I wouldn't expect the same behaviour/rules/culture in a shit posting community compared to an arch linux community, but I'm glad both types of communities and content will exist.

We can collectively choose what kinds of unique cakes to bake and we can choose which cakes to eat too. :D

[–] not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Sounds like a good AI feature for a Lemmy client app. "βœ… I don't want to see comments that only contain a pun."

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] gary@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Lemmy will likely have its own "the narwhal bacons at midnight" phase.

It'll interesting to see what it is...and then almost immediately tiresome.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 75 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Damn, we're already gatekeeping in here? Nice.

[–] TigerClawTV@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are you sure you liked Reddit?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NabiscoShredderWheat@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz 63 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I get what you're saying, but communities that spend time together will form their inside jokes, their way of doing things, etc. If you don't like it you don't have to participate. I say this with the upmost respect, but you need to get over yourself. Nobody is forcing you into a community.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] RanchOnPancakes@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So you're saying we should encourage people to not comment and participate because you personally don't enjoy something?

I know I'm being a bit over the top with the wording there but lets really think about it for a moment. Participation is engagement. And if we want Lemmy and by extension Lemmy.World to grow its what we need.

I upvoted you. Its a valid discussion to have. I just personally don't think its something we should be worried about in general.

[–] TWeaK@lemmy.ml 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Let Lemmy grow. Growth and low effort pun threads is not what killed reddit. Corporate interference and shit stirring controversy spewing algorithms in the name of "user engagement" is what drove reddit down the drain.

[–] Shadywack@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This right here. Puns aren't what was bad, it was the endless doomscrolling habit and continuous outrage going on that was. All the Rexxitors are going to see a serious uptick in their mental health. The puns were a coping mechanism, I think here that defensive reaction will be minimized.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zkxs@lemmy.sdf.org 51 points 1 year ago (13 children)

~~you have my updoot~~

I jest. Ultimately without some sort of mechanic that disincentivizes noisy, low-effort joke comments there's not going to be some sort of magical cultural shift. I'm just arriving, but from what I'm seeing Lemmy doesn't have any sort of design that will skew comments towards actual discussion and away from jokes/noise in any meaningful way.

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The way it is right now, we don't have total "karma", which I imagine helps to at least suppress the purely karma-farming spam. That said, there's no real reason to think it won't be added here eventually.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] TCGM@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's your opinion and you're welcome to it, but nothing will kill adoption rates harder than doing the whole early Mastodon thing of "you should change how you behave here"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm sorry.. but the pun threads are legendary. I actually hope they at the very least, continue.

It always puts a smile on my face.

[–] dystop@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (8 children)

...and my axe!

am i doing this right?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Master@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I also choose this guy's inside joke!

[–] ThatOneGuy@lemmy.one 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I would, but I broke both my arms.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bizzwell@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

For me, that was part of the charm.

I could still find the information I needed when it was a serious query, and I could still find sound and sensitive viewpoints on many topics. But, opening a horrible post just to see a horribly distasteful comment as the first response just kept reminding me not to take life so seriously.

[–] captain_americano@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm fine with a horribly distasteful comment, but for the love of God make it a unique horribly distasteful comment.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Lemmy sorts comments differently from reddit. Lemmy's documentation page about their algorithm describes reddit's algorithm as one that,

rewards comments that are repetitive and spammy.

It's an issue the developers claim to have a solution for.

I have no problem with jokes and comment chains. People should have their fun. But, I deleted my reddit account in frustration years ago. Reddit ranks the jokes higher than relevant discussion.

I'm cautiously optimistic. Lemmy is likely to be less prone to this particular problem.

[–] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wow, that's a clever little algorithm. It feels like it could work better.

Reddit's big problem (among many) was you had to get in early on a thread to contribute. Otherwise you could be so far at the bottom you might as well have sent your reply to the bit bucket.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SlowNoPoPo@lemm.ee 41 points 1 year ago

Don't expect human nature to change just because some ceo of a different company decided to be a greedy dick, honestly

[–] angrylittlekitty@lemmy.one 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the other thing to consider with low effort, duplication of memes is the server overhead. one thing to burn corporate coffers with the same people of walmart and cat tropes but this kind of stuff burns server and storage resources.

for a corporate entity looking to make billions off our data that's the cost of doing business -- but for lemmy server admins it's a truly personal cost.

imo we should be respectful of our "homes" and try not to trash them with low value content.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UntouchedWagons@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't mind most of them but I downvoted every "Google en passant" comment chain.

[–] swab148@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mantisteabaggin@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (12 children)

I spent an unhealthy amount of time on reddit over nearly the last decade, and somehow this is the first time seeing that phrase. I actually had to just google β€œgoogle en passant” to figure out what you’re talking about. I’m still not sure I understand the meme, and I’m certain Ive never seen it, or at least never paid attention to it if I did. Yet it must be common because at least two people bring it up in this thread. Crazy how that works.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Soltros@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I also hope nobody is going to be editing their comment and saying "wow, this blew up."

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This

Edit: thanks for the gold kind strangeerrr

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnspecificGravity@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hopefully you can find some social media platform that doesn't have any other people on it so that you can live in peace from the dumb shit that other people post.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ComputerSagtNein@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk, I love comment chains like that. The funny comments, references or comment interactions are often the funniest thing about a post.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FreeThinker@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To shreds you say, tsk tsk tsk. Well, how’s his wife holding up?

[–] GuyDudeman@beehaw.org 23 points 1 year ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Ozymati 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some people like that stuff, you don't have to but why make a point of yucking their yum?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlackCoffee@fedia.io 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't mind me, I am just waiting in the wings to "Choose someone's wife"

[–] sickmatter@fedia.io 21 points 1 year ago

I also choose this guy's wife.

[–] roo@lemmy.one 21 points 1 year ago

~~This is the way~~

At first I thought this is an overly pretentious post, but while writing a response I thought about some of the most upvoted yet heinously circlejerky comment threads I've had to wade through to get to a rational or different comment. Good point OP'Lem!

[–] UnforunateBlaster69@fedia.io 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This 🀣🀣🀣

[–] simple@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Edit: Thanks for the gold, kind stranger!!!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] RedditRefugee@fedia.io 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Google en passant, I'm an actual zombie

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] elonspez@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] redditrefugee@lemmy.one 21 points 1 year ago (15 children)

There's a noticeable generation gap between people who use 1!1!1! and the ones who would say sO MuCh tHiS! I'm not sure when it happened but I'm gonna guess you are about 35?

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί