this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
333 points (95.9% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2749 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 178 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Richard Nixon tried to nuke North Korea because he was drunker than a skunk and Kissinger had to tell the joint chiefs of staff to ignore him.

https://www.businessinsider.com/drunk-richard-nixon-nuke-north-korea-2017-1

It’s not trans people we need to worry about. It’s putting mentally weak and fragile men in charge of things.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not nuking North Korea was probably the right choice. On the other hand, I'd rather get vaporized in a nuclear fireball than starve to death in a reeducation camp for not clapping hard enough when [Great/Supreme/Dear] Leader farts.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd rather get nuked than show up to work Monday, but that's not really my call.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

You've now been banned from lemmy.seeyou.pyongyang

[–] Lemmylefty@lemmy.world 111 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

“There are 150 ICBM missiles that are being controlled by that Air Force base and by these individuals.”

“I do not want someone who doesn’t know if they are a man or a woman with their hand on a missile button.”

His “argument” is that trans people are inherently unstable because they are trans (really, questioning, but that distinction doesn’t matter to him).

This is what queer people are dealing with: the constant pathologizing of our very existence to the point where we’re viewed as a threat. This is why I can never accept people who continue to vote for these dangerous assholes: they either benefit from or are indifferent to the suffering this rhetoric engenders. It’s not a difference in opinion and deserves no such protection.

[–] Telorand@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well as we know, all cishet people know exactly who they are at any given time, and their personality, philosophy, epistemology, and tastes never cha—oh wait...

Must suck for him being so boring and predictable all the time, that he has to invent reasons to get all hot and bothered.

[–] Lemmylefty@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If we had to wait for only the eternally ethically pure, completely content and self-actualized people to be the ones to man the silos, we’d be waiting a longass time, because those people don’t join the military.

But we all know it’s just shitting on a minority in order to drum up a new scapegoat after gays finally became boring.

[–] reddwarf@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

It sounds very much like how women were ‘dismissed’ from essential roles in society because they were ‘fragile’, ‘overly emotional’, ‘suffer from hysteria’.

This all sounds like a repeat, we’ve been here before.

Only difference is that with lgbtiqa+ the very existence is denied to them.

[–] siv9939@kbin.social 68 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does that mean it's now the LGBTQICBM community?

[–] Turkey_Titty_city@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

i sexually identify as nuclear armageddon. my pronouns are Minuteman III/Trident II

[–] myslsl@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Cis people have launched more missiles at people in general. Better ban any sort of similar treatments for cis military members too.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I remember when they said letting women in the military would do exactly the same thing. They don't even make new arguements anymore.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

It's been the same argument for 150 years, they just keep repositioning their sights.

[–] Hairyblue@kbin.social 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I sure the trans community just wants to be treated fairy, and be able to pee in the restroom they are comfortable with. This guy is a hateful fearmonger.

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure the trans community just wants to be treated fairy

Hilariously inappropriate typo :)

[–] Hairyblue@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Damn the typos! LOL

[–] exohuman@kbin.social 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I would be more scared that a right wing white supremacist would launch nukes at everyone. Their existence is about hatred of others. Trans people’s existence is about trying to love themselves. I’m not scared of trans people, if you are then please ask yourself why you are. Are you afraid they would retaliate for how you treat them?

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So could non-trans soldiers. The problem isn't trans, it is (ICBM) arms control. Or transphobia.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Por que no los dos?

(That is, the problem is both arms control and transphobia)

[–] irkli@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

That's not the point of the bigots argument. He's just piling another inane fear thing that "trans" people "might do". Oooh scary trans folk!

The man is a shit and a bigot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Myriadblue@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Every accusation is a confession with conservatives.

[–] WanderingPoltergeist@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This should be a career ending statement, it's fallacious and trying to incite hate against the Trans community! However, I have a feeling this fool who speaks out of pocket garbage will get more votes than a saner candidate. 😬

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] donuts@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a transpocalypse. I have become Blahaj, destroyer of gendered bathrooms.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Grumble@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The congresspukes who bitch the loudest about the military are cowards who never set foot in a MEPS station themselves.

I'm not saying that you have to have served to have a valid opinion, but I am saying that this guy is talking out his ass.

[–] MedicatedMaybe@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well I say conservatives shouldn't be in the military because they aren't sure if they are America or Russian and could launch missiles on everyone.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

To be fair it says "could". Lots of people could do lots of things

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Man has trusted millitary personnel with ICBM missiles for years.

Moment there's a possibility they could be trans, becomes fearful they could do something that they were already capable (or incapable) or doing.

Sounds like a "you" problem to me.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So were the crew of the Enola Gay all trans?

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Yes, and I can prove it:

Enola

GAY

See, it's in the name!!

/s in case you need it.

[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nuclear strikes ordered by cisgendered people: 2

Nuclear strikes ordered by transgendered people: 0

Also, if you want the Democrats to keep the Senate, you should be rooting for Matt Rosendale to make as loud of an asshole of himself as possible, because him getting the Republican nomination would be a huge boost to Jon Tester, and the more stunts he pulls like this, the better his chances.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So if only trans people can launch the missiles, it seems like he should be pushing for more trans people in the miltary.

[–] qpnaosc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Not many people know this, but the original controls for the nuclear arsenal was written using obscure and nuanced language only trans people could understand. It was like the Navajo code talkers

[–] sweeterevenge@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

thank god i got out of montana. this is ridiculous.

[–] VanillaGorilla@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not entirely sure if I have no clue what trans people really really want or this guy, but I'm willing to bet my money on "this guy".

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[–] WheeGeetheCat@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Projecting again, hes thinking about the white supremacists in the military he knows which threaten to nuke leftists, and assuming left wing people are as shitty as he is - as usual.

[–] arensb@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I'm old enough to remember "Do you really want PMSing women in the military?" and this has some of the same energy.

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

ICBS is more like it. And this guy's got plenty to spare.

It's okay, those ICBM missiles are protected against unauthorized launch by a PIN number just like an ATM machine.

[–] asunaspersonalasst@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

He's nuts.

Ofc no sane trans person would wish to ICBM on non-targets, duh!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Projection.

[–] numbscroll@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not that people like this guy would ever actually hear this, but I love this bit from the article

Despite the stereotype that trans and nonbinary people don’t know what gender they are, they usually have put more thought into their gender identities than cisgender people have and have explored that aspect of themselves to a greater degree. Many transgender people know they are men or women with as much or even more certainty than many cisgender people, and nonbinary people don’t have the problem of knowing “if” they’re men or women because they can be just as certain that they are neither.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only makes sense if you think gender and biological sex are different things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Its_Always_420@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Huge trans phallic shaped objects, falling out of the sky and hitting everyone!

load more comments
view more: next ›