this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
923 points (97.8% liked)

Science Memes

11253 readers
2931 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Where's my imaginary love?

[–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Everyone is mentioning the imaginary (and, presumably complex) number domains, but not quaterions and other higher dimensional number sets.

I'm going with defining a describeable number as any number that, given any finite period of time and any finite amount of resources, could be uniquely described to another entity with the ability to read and understand the language it is being described in, then saying all numbers are either describeable numbers (Despite the fact that these are almost laughably uncommon in the scheme of all numbers, I have diligently prepared an example: "2"), or indescribeable numbers (so much more common, and yet I can't give even a single example).

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Eldritch numbers.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

Depends on the bit limit

[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Didn't it 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9?

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

That's just all the Arabic numerals

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›