this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

40438 readers
434 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I once bought a router to use for my internet when I moved into my new house just to find out that it "wasn't compatible" with Verizon's service. I still have it (because I'm terrible about returning things). Is there any point in keeping it? Is there anything fun or interesting that I could do with it?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 12 points 1 year ago

"Not Compatible" usually just means "We're extracting a monthly fee from you to use out provided router". Most likely, if you were to poke around, you could turn your ISP router/modem into a dumb modem and disable the inbuilt router, then connect your (better) wifi router to that.

[–] directhex@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Official guidance from Verizon is you can use your own router as a router, by setting your Verizon router as a modem only, then connecting it to the WAN port on your router. See e.g. https://kb.netgear.com/31100/How-do-I-set-up-my-Orbi-system-to-work-with-Fios

Unofficially, it's fine. You can just use your router. The modem is in the white box on the wall (the ONT) with fibre on one end and ethernet on the other. I've been running my router directly to the ONT for 3 years without issue. It just works fine.

Thanks for confirming my suspicion. I appreciate the link too.

[–] CorrodedCranium@lemmy.fmhy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could look into flashing a different firmware like DD-Wrt or Fresh Tomato. I use my second router to connect everything at my desk

I've never heard of these before. I'll have to check them out. Thanks for the suggestion.

[–] hamster@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It probably is compatible with your service. If you buy your own modem then you can use that router. You'll avoid the monthly fee.

I bet it's compatible and they don't get punished for lying. All they have to say is "Oh, it looks like it IS compatible after all."

[–] mershed_perderders@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

is it a wireless router? You could turn it into an access point and extend your wifi.

make it a separate, unconnected and open router to troll your neighbors/wardrivers

[–] livingcoder@lemmy.austinwadeheller.com 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Trolling people sounds interesting. Is there any way to have them auto-navigate to a rickroll upon connecting?

[–] knova@links.dartboard.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Potentially you could serve them a captive portal. I thought about this a while back, basically to create a sneakernet WiFi network where people could connect directly to a landing page that had my music for download, for example.

[–] livingcoder@lemmy.austinwadeheller.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That would be a great thing to setup at an airport (somewhere people sit around for hours, bored). So long as it's done to advertise your music and not to be malicious. I'm assuming your music isn't "Nails on a chalkboard" or "A baby crying", that could both be music and malicious.

[–] knova@links.dartboard.social 3 points 1 year ago

I think it's rather pleasant. Kind of chilled out electronic. https://music.knova.net

But yeah, no desire to be malicious. There is enough of that in the world.

[–] cloaker@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Gl.net make these great portable routers, I could see someone using one for this purpose.

[–] drpeppershaker@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll look into that, thanks.

[–] drpeppershaker@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Captive portal?

[–] NomadJones@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

If you're not going to hook it up to the internet (bridging, access point, etc.), name it something funny or provocative for the neighbors.

For example, I live in a college student neighborhood with a lot of Chinese students. I have an old router that I'm going to use the network name 六四屠殺 which is Chinese for the June Fourth Massacre (the Tiananmen Square Massacre). It's a term banned on the Chinese internet.

[–] livingcoder@lemmy.austinwadeheller.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like a good name around me would be "FreePublicWifi". Can you get in trouble for naming it something like "[city name]WifiNetwork"?

[–] cloaker@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, usually falls under impersonation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Thomasnotused@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you have anywhere in your home with poor Wi-Fi signal, you could set up the router in bridge mode to effectively act as a range extender. Just make sure to disable DHCP on the 2nd router or it will wreak havoc!

[–] livingcoder@lemmy.austinwadeheller.com 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A wifi extender would be awesome! Thanks for the suggestion.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Best is actually to connect the two with a cable, otherwise you lose a lot of bandwidth.

[–] livingcoder@lemmy.austinwadeheller.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope it's not too terrible, purely over wifi. Maybe when my son gets older and wants to play games on his own computer, I'll pipe a line over to the other side of the house for him. I don't think his sister is going to care enough about computers to want a direct line to the internet, but if she does then I'll do it for her too.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It effectively cuts it by half.

[–] livingcoder@lemmy.austinwadeheller.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That makes sense. I just hope that it's good enough for YouTube.

[–] DaGeek247@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Youtube 4k is only 20mbps - any pair of routers with better than 802.11n will do just fine. n is technically 300mbps, but try to push that through a wall or three and it drops to nothing real quick.

That sounds promising. Thanks for the numbers. I'm planning to put the second router under their rooms, so I would think that one set of flooring shouldn't be too bad.

[–] Billy_Gnosis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I did this with my old router and as others have said it effectively cuts throughput in half. Depending on your usage though it might not be a big deal. I only connected mine so I could get a signal in the front yard. It's fine for surfing the web or watching YouTube

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrJizzard@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When I upgraded to a mesh system a while back, I turned my old router into a dedicated access point just for playing VR games wirelessly on my PC. Performance improved noticably once it didn't have to compete with the regular house WiFi traffic.

[–] livingcoder@lemmy.austinwadeheller.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I assume you had a hardline from the VR router to the central router? Otherwise wouldn't the wireless communication between the VR router and the central router be in the same competition as the VR headset was before?

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most/all of the data transfer in their case wouldn't be hitting the regular router; the spare router would only be acting as a go-between from the PC to the VR headset

[–] livingcoder@lemmy.austinwadeheller.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, so you have a main router for internet traffic (wifi access for extended router and other devices) and another router extended from it that both your VR headset and PC connect to for VR-type data communication, still providing internet to the PC with about half the bandwidth?

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

That's how I'd set it up, yeah. Most VR games are gonna be local, not needing a ton of internet bandwidth

[–] slowd0wn@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Custom firmware like tomato or ddwrt can be fun to just play around with and learn more about networking. I used my old router temporarily as both a wifi repeater and as a wifi receiver using custom firmware. I didn’t need it for any particular function, but it was fun to experiment with

Yeah, I think I'm going to tinker with it in this way. I have some knowledge about networking, but I know that I could learn more, for sure.

[–] ParkingPsychology@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I run double firewalls.

I just don't fully trust the ISP router, so I disabled the wifi and hooked it up to my own router. If the ISP router gets hacked, my internal network doesn't get exposed.

Port forwarding is a bit harder, but you probably aren't even doing that at all (and it still works anyway, it's just an extra step).

[–] livingcoder@lemmy.austinwadeheller.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's an interesting idea. How do you access the router connected to the ISP to setup port forwarding to your second router? If it's too complicated to type out here, I'll understand.

[–] digitallyfree@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The easiest way would be to just bridge the ISP router if it supports that feature. To connect back to the ISP router's webui you can setup outbound NAT on your second router (generally only available on enterprise gear). Don't double NAT unless there's no other option.

If you can bridge, the sky's the limit in terms of what gear you can have on the backend. My bridged modem is directly connected to a L3 switch which links to my Proxmox cluster, and my Opnsense router exists virtually in the cluster and can be migrated freely between the machines.

[–] livingcoder@lemmy.austinwadeheller.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your setup sounds very interesting to me. If I wasn't so obsessed with writing code, I would have been deep into hardware. I imagine that it will become a hobby of mine when I hit my midlife crisis. I'll be buying up all kinds of hardware, quiting my job, and connecting everything to everything.

[–] digitallyfree@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Homelabbing is an amazing hobby if you're into this stuff, and you can go as far down the rabbit hole as you like :)

My lab also supports my coding endeavors since I can deploy VMs, run a local Git server, and so forth. Most of my development is done in a SPICE VDI on Proxmox.

[–] alex_02@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago

You could probably turn it into an extended access point or something like that. You could also set it up to be used in like let's say a lab or something like that. If possible, check what router it is and see if you can put OpenWrt or something like that on it.

If not, collecting dust in a box isn't a bad idea either, just if you decide to take it out again to clean it thoroughly.

[–] waterbottleonashelf@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could make a pretty nifty looking hat

Maybe for Halloween, I could be "Internet Man".

[–] baascus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Might be able to get a few bucks for it on craigslist or fb if it's not too old

[–] livingcoder@lemmy.austinwadeheller.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I may end up going this route if I can't turn it into a wifi extender. Having some coverage on the other side of the house would be amazing.

[–] baascus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Mesh/range extenders really suck terribly, and that cannot be overstated. If you do any streaming or gaming or video calls, don't do that on mesh APs or range extenders. Especially if you live near other people.

[–] livingcoder@lemmy.austinwadeheller.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My kids would be the ones benefiting from the range extender and they'd only be watching YouTubeKids on their tablets. I don't think they'd notice any issues with latency assuming that the buffer is able to load faster than the videos play. Thoughts?

load more comments (2 replies)

Why is this? I got some free with my ISP and just have them set up so i can manually plug things like my TV or Xbox in and not have them using their wifi.

No point get a modem

load more comments
view more: next ›