this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
6 points (100.0% liked)

British Columbia

1365 readers
3 users here now

News, highlights and more relating to this great province!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Why the hell is it taking so long to tell people what it is?

If it's not a carcinogen or whatever, tell people what it is so they don't panic.

[–] Paragone@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And .. what was the chemical-profile of this smell, that .. doesn't need to be tested, .. to know that it doesn't contain health-risks??

Neither ideology nor prejudice substitutes validly for scientific-method.

Don't accept bullshit/propaganda in science's place.

_ /\ _

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

Bowcock said it was a “common” fuel product that’s used to heat up the refinery process that was burning.

“It’s not anything that we would find as highly toxic or any kind of chemical waste, it’s actually a hydrocarbon product,” he said.

Probably some petrochemical gas like diesel, or some burnt oil product. Would be helpful if they tested it still, even if it wasn't that serious.