this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
33 points (97.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35873 readers
1546 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The sheer number of videos taken "the wrong way round" (for my computer's monitor) is mind-boggling. I get that some people watch videos on their phones, but is it really that many?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wouldn't even mind vertical videos that much, but the real fucking cancer are vertical videos with baked-in black borders for 16:9 ratio, so you can't view them comfortably on anything and the resolution is like 1/4 of the original.

Bonus if those borders are also filled with ads or other annoying bullshit.

[–] danielton@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I don't know why creators even do that with the black borders... you can't even watch those on a phone. Annoys the crap out of me.

[–] Billy_Gnosis@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

YouTube started monetizing Shorts and reduced the payouts to regular long form YouTube videos which is anything wide screen and over 60 seconds. It's pretty much forcing content creators to start doing Shorts if they want to try and not lose as much revenue

[–] Saturdaycat@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

TIL, that's just screwed. Sometimes short form content can be interesting, but 99% of the time I want a video I can watch along to. It's terrible and I don't understand the intense appeal these have. Didn't Vine start it all?

[–] decentralized@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I think there has been a major culture shift. YouTube used to prioritize the subscriber feed where you curated your own content. Now it is the home feed where it is fed by algorithm. Shorts seems to be an extension of this where it is pretty much non stop algorithmic feed. If you were used to the old way the new way seems strange, but if not I guess the new way is more intuitive? I couldn't say

I don't know that there's actual appeal outside of the fact that the format seems to be optimized to give our lizard brains the quick hit. There isn't anything inherently wrong with divided attention - we don't think it's bad when we're having a conversation while watching fish in a pond, for example - but I think Vine, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube Shorts et al are the result of years of data corporations honing in on capitalizing our attention.

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I wish I could at least block Shorts.

[–] Negative_Pair_5694@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

For uBlock:

! YT Homepage - Hide the Shorts section
youtube.com##[is-shorts]
! YT Menu - Hide the Shorts button
www.youtube.com###guide [title="Shorts"], .ytd-mini-guide-entry-renderer[title="Shorts"]
! YT Search - Hide Shorts
www.youtube.com##ytd-search ytd-video-renderer [overlay-style="SHORTS"]:upward(ytd-video-renderer)
! YT Search and Channels - Hide the Shorts sections
www.youtube.com##ytd-reel-shelf-renderer
! YT Channels - Hide the Shorts tab
www.youtube.com##ytd-browse[page-subtype="channels"] [role="tab"]:nth-of-type(3):has-text(Shorts)
! YT Subscriptions - Hide Shorts - Grid View
www.youtube.com##ytd-browse[page-subtype="subscriptions"] ytd-grid-video-renderer [overlay-style="SHORTS"]:upward(ytd-grid-video-renderer)
! YT Subscriptions - Hide Shorts - List View
www.youtube.com##ytd-browse[page-subtype="subscriptions"] ytd-video-renderer [overlay-style="SHORTS"]:upward(ytd-item-section-renderer)
! YT Sidebar - Hide Shorts
www.youtube.com###related ytd-compact-video-renderer [overlay-style="SHORTS"]:upward(ytd-compact-video-renderer)

[–] theJWPHTER88@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Seems quite extensive, but... do I place some and/or all of it on the "My rules" or "My filters" tab on uBlock?

My Filters indeed

[–] RFBurns@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Paste it at the bottom of your "my filters" section. Be sure to "Apply" when done.

[–] khab@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nice! Is there a version that would work on PiHole?

[–] Negative_Pair_5694@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think that would work. PiHole works on a DNS level and has no insight to the encrypted connection to Youtube. So it cannot see or modify the site content on the fly. uBlock Origin basically can (beside DNS based blocking) modify the websites' code after it has loaded into your browser.

[–] Hedup@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Doesn't seem to work. Do I need to restart? I still see #shorts videos in my sub feed.

I'm using uBlock Origin.

[–] grehund@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

don't we all.

[–] Ignacio@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

"Enhacer for YouTube" (a Firefox extension, and maybe Chromium too) hides shorts for good.

[–] Nihilore@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i have a browser extension that does it

[–] slipperydippery@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah me too. I don't want to see shorts on my subscriptions page

[–] sheawoodrow@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Youtube is using Shorts to try to compete with TikTok in shortform video.

[–] kratoz29@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lol, I initially misread it as "shitform"

It is mis-written as shortform

[–] z3n0x@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because corporate enshittification aka "mobile first", "stories" etc.

[–] hydra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Mobile first is a good, valid approach for responsive UI. But these amateur webdevs do mobile ONLY neglecting other UI densities and form factors so all corporate websites look like half-assed phone apps. Not to mention the usage of bloated frameworks to save time.

[–] AnonymousLlama@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Not keen on vertical content if it's anything more than a few seconds. This portrait-first approach really seems to have taken off with YouTube Shorts, Instagram and TikTok but for long form videos it's a no-go

[–] McBinary@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would assume because most videos are taken from mobile now. Camera quality in phones is crazy good now.

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I mean, like I suspect for most people, my phone is my camera too, but it's perfectly capable of taking landscape videos.

[–] decentralized@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I think this is going to be a generational divide. Most of my millennial friends will insist on landscape while zoomers tend to default to portrait.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

My Moto G Stylus even does landscape videos with the phone held vertical. Moto gets me.

[–] Ataraxia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Right. I only take vertical if I'm showing a tree or a plant but for a scene or most other pics it's horizontal.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The large majority of content is also consumed on phones, so confirming to computers is making less sense

[–] AnAngryAlpaca@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can't wait for the first Hollywood movie in portrait format! /s

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

I had to look up the name but Qibi was (...is...?) a streaming service specialising in precisely that.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Seems like something Rian Johnson would do.

[–] Osvaldoilustrador@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Although funny enough, after shorts showing up and getting big attention, I noticed more and more youtubers making longer and longer videos, as if they were trying to go to the polar opposite of shorts

[–] andyMFK@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago

Today's younger generation mostly watch content on their phones, Instagram, tik tok, YouTube etc. They're holding their phone portrait to view this content so that's how they produce content. And that's a popular demographic to target so yeah, it's catching on for better or worse

[–] danielton@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Because people take videos with their phones and apparently don't know you can hold phones in landscape (or just don't want to... most people I know leave auto-rotation turned off, which I don't understand; it is something I always loved about modern smartphones)

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes mobile devices have far surpassed desktop / laptop computers in usage numbers as of years ago. Landscape was probably the preferred video format for a long time because it works for both mobile and desktop but the mobile dominance is so high at this point in life that I’ll bet no one cares.

[–] Ataraxia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On my phone I prefer landscape though. I don't watch any videos in portrait so I skip them. It's no effort to flip the phone sideways lol...

[–] minorninth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think it's about short-form vs long-form content.

For casual short videos like TikTok or random shorts that scroll by in Facebook, Instagram, or YouTube, portrait makes sense because most people have their phone in that orientation.

For long-form video, landscape is still the norm.

[–] snerk@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The overwhelming majority of internet users do so on mobile devices (92%+) and the majority of internet traffic is to mobile devices (55-60% depending on who you ask).

It's also to the point where it's not uncommon for people to not even own a desktop or laptop anymore unless they have a specific need for it. Instead phones and tablets are much more common among people who only ever used computers for casual internet browsing.

[–] saturnonice@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah young people these days innit. now get off my lawn.

[–] Osvaldoilustrador@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

they try hard to beat tiktok, that's why, and every new feature gets a huge reach, which makes people use it more and more. it kinda sucks ngl

[–] AskThinkingTim@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

They are trying to make it realistic and unedited with the use of mobile phones and Youtube shorts. They are trying to compete with TikTok when their market is clearly somewhere else.

[–] Otome-chan@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

people make videos for tiktok which is for phones and oriented as such. people then repost them to youtube. similarly, youtube shorts are made to copy the tiktok style. So yes, there's a lot of people who watch shortform videos on their phone.

[–] Ronno@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hope AI can soon fix this, that we can record everything in wide format, and that AI cuts it down to various screen sizes. I dislike VVS, but I can also imagine watching landscape content in portrait is also annoying.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hedup@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there a way to block all shorts in my youtube feed?

[–] topperharlie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

the only way I found is to press the X on top right and then it is hidden (in theory) for 1 month or so, haven't checked if it's for all devices though. I hate with passion that there is no way of permanently disable it (last time I checked)

If someone knows a way I'll be happy to know it :-)

[–] AskThinkingTim@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

They are trying to make it realistic and unedited with the use of mobile phones and Youtube shorts. They are trying to compete with TikTok when their market is clearly somewhere else.

load more comments
view more: next ›