this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
488 points (97.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7228 readers
179 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Members of the House committee that investigated the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol have warned America for three years to take former President Donald Trump at his word.

Now, as Trump is poised to win the Republican presidential nomination, his criminal trials face delays that could stall them past Election Day, and his rhetoric grows increasingly authoritarian, some of those lawmakers find themselves following their own advice.

In mid-March, Trump said on social media that the committee members should be jailed. In December he vowed to be a dictator on “day one.” In August, he said he would “have no choice” but to lock up his political opponents.

“If he intends to eliminate our constitutional system and start arresting his political enemies, I guess I would be on that list,” said Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-San Jose). “One thing I did learn on the committee is to pay attention and listen to what Trump says, because he means it.”

Lofgren added that she doesn’t yet have a plan in place to thwart potential retribution by Trump. But Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Burbank), who has long been a burr in Trump’s side, said he’s having “real-time conversations” with his staff about how to make sure he stays safe if Trump follows through on his threats.

“We’re taking this seriously, because we have to,” Schiff said. “We’ve seen this movie before … and how perilous it is to ignore what someone is saying when they say they want to be a dictator.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] quink@lemmy.ml 144 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (7 children)

Non-American just double-checking I’ve got his right…

Private citizen makes actionable credible threat to unlawfully detain legislators, legislators choose to do nothing for about half a year before slowly murmuring without specifics other than “yeah he said it” and “I think he means us”.

You OK USA? Just checking in.

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 61 points 7 months ago (2 children)

There is, unfortunately, no law against saying you're going to be a power abusing jackass. And the Republicans have decided that if he gets into office, they'll protect him from impeachment and removal no matter what. His lawyers have literally argued that the president can order assassinations of their political rivals.

So no, we're not okay.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago

There is, unfortunately, no law against saying you’re going to be a power abusing jackass.

I would argue that Trump committed sedition and terroristic threats. The trouble is that everyone in the Federal government is either too chickenshit or too traitorous themselves to prosecute.

[–] quink@lemmy.ml 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I see. I should have my lawyers argue buying a $1,000,000 house for $0 is reasonable, that way a deal for $500,000 is perfectly reasonable. In the same way that threatening to illegally detain is a halfway compromise between nothing and threatening murder.

And it seems that imprisoning political opponents goes beyond carting down a hill in a shopping trolley which is what we here overseas associate with “jackass”, but what do I know.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 44 points 7 months ago

We are not okay. Nothing will happen to him about it, though. He can be literally court ordered to not talk shit about courtroom staff or families, then talk shit about them, and he gets nothing other than a reduced bond and an extension to pay that.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 42 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (8 children)

https://images.app.goo.gl/fQWwqgb2CPyjUDkM7

Jokes aside, if the US falls to fascism, it’s gonna be a massive problem for Europe. Imagine fascists in charge of the biggest nation with a history of colonialism, and the world’s largest stockpile of nukes.

It would be awesome if the other first-world nations started taking this threat seriously, before it’s too late.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 48 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

We need the world to issue sanctions against the US. Please sanction us. We lost control of the government and need your help

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 36 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Giving our oligarchs the same treatment as russian oligarchs would be a good start. Seize their property and assets wherever and whenever possible.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 14 points 7 months ago

Certainly I think it would be fair that they pay reparations for their crimes.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

We are not. Please send help

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

No we're not ok.

On the one hand moderate and liberal voters, the DNC, establishment Democrats, centerist corporate news stations, past presidents and Biden himself are talking about how dangerous Trump is. He cannot be allowed to win.

Okay, sounds serious. Serious enough to make some big moves in order to get the votes necessary to win by a comfortable margin? If you check out Biden's insistence on continuing to ship weapons to Israel the answer is "no".

And really this encapsulates the problem with so called moderates and liberals. When faced with a choice between left or right when the center cannot hold they just fuck around, stall or outright sabotage leftist efforts. Effectively cementing a rightward victory and then blaming it on leftists.

It's pretty pathetic how often they play this game and considering they actually do seem sincerely worried about Trump it's bewildering why they aren't seeking more cooperative efforts with leftists and progressives. They remain steadfastly confident stern lectures, as if leftists and progressives owe their votes, are all that is necessary.

[–] StarshotJohn@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

No, we are not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Oh look, yet another reminder of why the working class must never disarm.

SocialistRA.org

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 20 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Or why people need to get their shit together and get involved in politics

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why not both? I think everyone towards the left should consider some firearms. When history repeats itself Donald will be executing the socialists first. I do hope the dim bulbs of America get a clue before November, but I don't know if we should trust that they will.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago

It doesn't help that the largest employers in the US (Gov & USPS) bar their employees from involvement even at the local level if anyone can announce their party affiliation.

If you go further down the list of employers, it's a bunch of people who are mostly too overworked to have the time to vote...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I agree with the ideals behind socialism more than any other political ideology. I own a gun. I don't think it would do me a bit of good if a modern government decided I should be dead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 26 points 7 months ago (11 children)

Trump himself isn’t going to do anything.

Who would be the ones arresting them.

[–] Grobmobularb@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It boggles my mind that anyone would listen to anything that fat fucking twatburger says.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 19 points 7 months ago
[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He doesn't need anyone to arrest his opponents. He just needs the fervent MAGA base to be whipped up into a frenzy like on Jan 6th. To be so angry if no LEO arrests Trump's opponents that they go out kill them, because hey it's totally cool now because Trump's a dictator.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpeakingColors@beehaw.org 9 points 7 months ago

That's kind of how the whole thing could/should fall apart. "Authority" gives a command and someone down the chain has to enact it, if that person or persons above the chain refused to act - there would be conflict, but hopefully the opportunity for realization that authority gave an objectionable command. The cynical take is that any number of enthusiastic appeasers would enact the command to engratiate themselves to the authority in the system, defeating the message of the refusal.

Unfortunately, much of American machismo includes stepping on others to get a better view, or to be viewed more prominently by favored authority. So to answer your question, there's probably a dishearteningly large pool of people who would jump at the tasks Trump would dictate.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 14 points 7 months ago (8 children)

His cult will eat that shit up, completely forgetting he promised to lock up Hillary Clinton and they all ate that up too.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 9 points 7 months ago

Fortunately they are a minority. Unfortunately the US isn't a democracy

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 months ago (4 children)

What charges will he have them arrested for? I don't think that the president can just demand that people be arrested.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 17 points 7 months ago

If he has the right people in place he can do whatever we allow him to get away with. No one is going to arrest the president that's for sure. :(

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

They also can't tell people to storm the Capitol and try to overthrow an election they lost.

They also can't just take classified data when they're voted out of office and sell it to the Saudis.

They also can't fire the FBI director for investigating the White House.

They also can't with old military aid from another government because they won't fabricate evidence against their political rivals.

They also can't collude with state officials to throw out votes.

They also can't use campaign funds for hush-money payments.

There's a lot a President can't do that Trump has done.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] alex_02@infosec.pub 7 points 7 months ago

It is good to see that people are finally talking about this outside of twitter.

load more comments
view more: next ›