this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
140 points (90.7% liked)

Privacy

32108 readers
641 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 115 points 7 months ago (2 children)

That was a huge wall of text - TLDR :

  • Kagi has private investors
  • Kagi has had some questionable uses of the private funding, such as opening a t-shirt company
  • Kagi started as a AI focused company and pivoted to search
  • Kagi is spread too thin over many different projects
  • Kagi doesn't take privacy, or user data seriously

Fair enough, but as long as google, bing, ddg, etc get more and more unusable there will be fans of alternative searches

Even if Kagi crashes and burns, it has demonstrated there is a market demand for useful search results that users pay for directly.

FWIW I don't use Kagi because of the login / payment info requirements, so I agree broadly with the author. As bad as public searching is, its good enough to not give up privacy.

[–] lemmyreader@lemmy.ml 35 points 7 months ago

Thanks for the summary!

I'm not a Kagi user but I see people enthusiastically promote it often on Lemmy so I thought it was worth sharing this. After doing this post I noticed it is on HN as well, with 100 comments : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40011314

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've been really enjoying Qwant since I started using it after Mozilla announced their partnership.

I am super annoyed when the "turn of ad blocker" popup shows itself. They'd get many more users by not using that and serving ads from the same domain as searches. I get that they have to pay for their services somehow.

[–] RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works 14 points 7 months ago

FYI Qwant shares some of your info with Microsoft, specifically your IP

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 40 points 7 months ago

the CEO sealioning after the author asked them not to contact them anymore is a bit icky, too.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 37 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Kagi is one of the least trustworthy companies I've seen recently. I know it has fans, but it constantly talks out of both sides of its mouth.

Turns out Kagi does do advertising

Kagi does not give a solitary damn about privacy as the average person understands it.

We did not say we maintain anonmity, but privacy, which are two different things. For example. your parents may know everything about you, yet still respect your privacy.

Kagi lied in its emails.

"AI is mentioned zero times"

...is clearly incorrect.

There's quite a lot more to distrust about a company that wants to lock you into a filter bubble.

[–] Vexz@kbin.social 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Turns out Kagi does do advertising

They promote their search engine but their users don't get to see ads. I don't know what's wrong about that. Every company advertises with its products. I don't see what's reprehensible about that.

We did not say we maintain anonmity, but privacy, which are two different things. For example. your parents may know everything about you, yet still respect your privacy.

They're right, anonymity and privacy are two different things. Since you have to pay to use Kagi, you're not anonymous. But they allegedly don't know what you as the user search for when using their search engine. So they're being honest here and how can honesty be bad here? Anyways, we're on privacy@lemmy.ml, not anonymity@lemmy.ml or whatever.

“AI is mentioned zero times”

While I still give you this one, they're technically correct. The word "AI" isn't there but they mention AI features, haha. It's a bit debatable since Vlad said "kagi.com" - which doesn't mention AI or AI tools. Only when you go to the pricing page there are mentions of AI tools.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago

I don't think we have an argument except maybe on technicality, so I'll do my best to use your points as a springboard for further clarification/critique of Kagi and not of you.

They promote their search engine but their users don't get to see ads. I don't know what's wrong about that.

What's wrong is Vlad had just said "That community is 100% responsible for Kagi's growth as a business through word of mouth (Kagi does no paid advertising)"

And he should be the first person to know that statement isn't correct.

may know everything about you, yet still respect your privacy.

The problem here is that nobody in this community will recommend a corporation that "may know everything about you but respect your privacy."

  • When recommending a messager service, common consensus always leans towards the one that knows the least about you.
  • This is because corporations can change or be forced to give up data, which would render the pinkie-promise of "we won't" moot
  • I've seen an argument posted here or on Reddit that Google is technically private because they know about you and won't sell ads; it's basically the Kagi line. Basically nobody cares even if it's true (and it's turned out to not be true).

Vlad said "kagi.com" - which doesn't mention AI or AI tools.

Maybe not the homepage, but the site itself is very explicit about AI being the point of their project. And if Kagi will change their statements about everything else on a dime, and have such poor views on privacy, why not also follow their own manifesto?

You can read their pro-AI manifesto on the Kagi.com domain right here.

You can read a critique of this manifesto and how it talks about you "volunteering" your data to search engines, and other creepy stuff, right here.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 37 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I had no faith to lose. Its a search engine sign into. How could that be private.

[–] Vexz@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago

They allegedly don't know their user's search queries. That's how it's allegedly private.

[–] macattack@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I enjoyed reading the article. To me, the perspective of the owner reminds me of the owners of Brave in that they are Libertarian in ways that seem aligned with mainstream views at a glance but the Venn diagram also overlaps with a disdain for regulation, while portraying a (potential) facade of being eternally infallible and trustworthy while also being a for-profit company.

Elon Musk also comes to mind in that his intelligence leaves him vulnerable to overlooking the nuances of conversations and alternative point of views. I think there's a general over reliance on artificial intelligence as a savior that will be fully embraced that will lead to large issues in the short/long term for Kagi.

Personally, it always felt a little bit like astroturfing hearing all of the kagi fanboys in every privacy thread, but for what it's worth, seeing them show up live In the flesh in this thread as well makes me feel a bit less like I'm talking to bots lol

Personally, I self-host my own version of searXng that only uses search engines that don't track my IP address. I'd say that those results are good enough 90% of the time, and when I need something more granular, I use a publicly hosted version of searXng that uses Google in its results

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago (2 children)

How can anyone worry about IP addresses when the search engine also knows your real world payment credentials? That and privacy don't really mix.

[–] Vexz@kbin.social 10 points 7 months ago

They know the names of their customers but they don't know their search queries. There's the privacy. At least that's what they said. Since Kagi isn't Open Source it always comes down to trust.

[–] AVengefulAxolotl@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So, this means Proton is not private either? Any product you pay for cannot be private?

There is a difference between anonimity and privacy.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Email is inherently not private. Even if your own provider zealously protects your privacy, if the person you're emailing uses Gmail, that's all she wrote.

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 23 points 7 months ago

Wow, those unsolicited emails are icky

[–] Lemmchen@feddit.de 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Am I the only one thinking Lori comes across as a bit of a dick here?

[–] AVengefulAxolotl@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah kind of, but the CEO needs to learn that not everyone will like their products, you cant convince everyone.

The person said that they dont want to engage with the discussion, then the CEO should have just let it be.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

This is the second CEO to be a weirdo to a random person in the past month. First it was the Tumblr CEO, now it's the Kagi one.

Kagi was already in hot water for ignoring its paying customers' previous complaints, so this whole "I really want to know your opinion, we are a human first company!" thing really sounds disingenuous after the same CEO overruled away all criticism or tried shuffling it away from public channels and onto his much more closed-off Discord.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dnu@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 7 months ago

What's wrong with having boundaries?

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I am suspicious of anything I see being pushed as heavily as Kagi is pushed by it's alleged users.

[–] Lemmchen@feddit.de 4 points 7 months ago (4 children)

We're just vocal because we've been suffering over the enshittification of Google search for so long.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Affidavit@aussie.zone 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (7 children)

TBH, OP sounds like a bit of an ~~entitled douche~~, edit: not the most appropriate descriptor, but I do think OP should try and look at the situation from another perspective.

In their blog post they complained about lack of transparency and noted numerous issues with Kagi that caused them to lose faith in the company. The CEO personally responds to explain themselves (i.e. make things more transparent) and OP sticks their fingers in their ears and acts liked they're a victim because the CEO attempts service recovery.

I've made public complaints about companies before. I wish I received such tailored and personalised responses.

[–] macattack@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Did we read the same article? His responses to GDPR were very concerning, and I say that as an American.

[–] tjhart85@kbin.social 13 points 7 months ago

Right?! Super easy to be "privacy focused" when you just flat out refuse to acknowledge anything as personally identifiable information!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dirk_Darkly@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I haven't seen many public diatribes against Kagi, but the ones I have seem to be like this person. They complain very publicly based on their perception of Vlad, spend their days in Discord fomenting drama (which seems like something only children should be doing) and are so fragile that they think getting measured emails from someone they went after publicly is a form of harrassment. It's absurd.

I can only hope this was written by a teenager, otherwise it's a pretty rough way to live as an adult.

[–] Affidavit@aussie.zone 8 points 7 months ago

After reading your comment, my calling the OP an 'entitled douche' was not the best response. I remember the fragility of being a teenager, and even being a young adult... While unlikely, if the blog's author does come across these comments, I would rather they take a moment to consider things from Vlad's/Kagi's perspective rather than just take my comment as a personal attack.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Well that sucks... that vlad dude is ehm... weird. I am happy with the service I am getting from Kagi, but such behaviour is not acceptable...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I spun up a docker container for searxng

[–] Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Next step is to make it public to help other people and blend your data/traffic

[–] capital@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Open a search app to the public? So their searches come from my IP address? No fucking way, unless I'm missing something.

[–] alansuspect@aussie.zone 3 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I'm still trying to understand searxng, does it start with nothing and build up its index each time you search? Will your results be rubbish for a while?

[–] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

It just culminates results from a bunch of other engines

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Successful CEOs need to learn to shut the fuck up.

[–] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 7 months ago (11 children)

Conflicted! Cory Doctorow just endorsed it & I’m way less smart than that person so i usually do what they say :\

[–] lemmyreader@lemmy.ml 15 points 7 months ago

Cory Doctorow, seems like a really nice, important and smart fellow but has his weak moments as well :-) https://pluralistic.net/2024/02/05/cyber-dunning-kruger/#swiss-cheese-security

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 5 points 7 months ago

Seems like people making people mistakes. Not anything horrific.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I'm still considering giving it a try. I've been using the free perplexity app to do all my searching with recently and that's worked pretty well, but not perfect.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›