this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
1266 points (95.5% liked)

Science Memes

11148 readers
3639 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BeefPiano@lemmy.world 146 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Time and space are the same thing, if you’re traveling in time it seems like you could travel in space at the same time.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 85 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah but traveling in space takes time, so you can reason that traveling in time takes space.

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 41 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Right so have we tried putting the Time Machine in the middle of a football field or smthn?

[–] captainjaneway@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yes and that's how we ended up with American Football. In the original timeline, it never existed.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

how do i get to that timeline

[–] YoorWeb@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You have to turn left in 1867.

[–] variants@possumpat.io 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I thought it was Albuquerque

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

That's where you must have taken a wrong toin.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Which is why the deLorean was an amazing time machine, obviously.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

I think that's the joke. Media presents time travel as just inputting the date and off you go, but really you need to input time AND space because the two are interconnected.

Of course we could just imagine that all time machines somehow calculate the space itself just by knowing the current spacetime and the inputted time, but now we're giving writers too much benefit of doubt. In most cases time travel is used as plot device and very little thought is given to how it could work.

And an interesting sidenote. This also means that teleportation is a special case of time travel and if you've solved time travel you've probably also solved teleportation.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] walter_wiggles 13 points 7 months ago

So you're saying that, if you're traveling in space it seems like you could travel in time at the same space.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If they were really the same thing, traveling into the past would be trivial. Greg Egan's Orthogonal series explores the consequences of space and time actually being the same thing. You can also the the difference in formulas related to proper time, where terms for space and time have opposite signs. Space and time have the same relationship to each other as real and imaginary numbers, in a fairly literal sense.

[–] pancakes@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago

What is time, if not curvy space?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 83 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

A time machine would necessarily need to have some way of defining what reference frame one is stationary in space relative towards, because there is no universal frame that everything moves relative to. This suggests that a time machine ought to let you move through space as well as time

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago (5 children)

So to travel into the future and be in the "same place" relative to your planet you'd need to solve the n-body problem for at least your local system to a suitable length of time. A slight error might mean you appear inside the planet or in outer space.

Or maybe I don't understand this stuff. :-)

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago

Mass bends spacetime so one could assert that a time machine could anchor itself to a sufficiently large mass, just like how things in orbit are still bound to the earth's mass.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You'd also need to solve time travel.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 73 points 7 months ago (11 children)

Since relativity tells us there is no universal reference frame, then it having its reference tied to earth is perfectly valid.

Also sidenote: my favourite idea about time travel is that time travel is entirely possible, but will never be invented, because the timeline where its not invented is the only stable timeline. Because any timeline where it IS invented gets changed as soon as you use it, meaning the timeline changes over and over again every time time travel is invented repeatedly either infinitely or until someone accidentally creates a timeline where its never invented, only then does the timeline stop changing and we can actually experience it. So because we exist and can experience time, we can deduce that we will never invent time travel.

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 7 months ago

There can be stable timelines with time travel - there's actually 3 states:

  • Perpetual instability, where the timeline changes each time the time machine is used but never reaches the same state twice

  • Perpetual cyclic stability, where people's actions in modifying the timeline lead to it eventually reaching the same state, eg. you go back in time to kill someone who becomes evil and oppresses you but the near death experience leads them capture you, so you can't time travel any more, and to blame your people and start oppressing them, leading to the same actions

  • Stability without time travel, which is the default state but incredibly hard to get once time travel is invented as with nobody to stop time travel being invented it would probably get invented again, however parts of a cyclically stable timeline could have nobody having access to time travel, but any actions by time travellers to stop time travel would likely lead to the second rather than third option

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 49 points 7 months ago (4 children)

In most media time machines are also teleporters - many are explicitly so, with the destination space needing to be chosen at the same time as the destination time, but even when that's not shown they still make the time traveller suddenly vanish and then just suddenly reappear elsewhen.

One movie I've seen with a more "realistic" time machine is Primer. It's not at all a teleporter or portal. Very slight spoiler:

It sidesteps the whole issue that OP presents because the place where you exit the machine after traveling is just where the machine is when it's turned on to begin with. You can't time travel outside the machine, including to before it exists, and your path (in all four dimensions) is contiguous.

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I prefer the H.G. Wells The Time Machine style of time travel , where you affect the flow of time instead of a discontinuous jump.

You're still attached to your current location, things just happen faster (in forwards or reverse). It also means that time travel takes time, which can be a handy plot tool.

Edit: grammatical swipe keyboard errors

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Primer is one of my favourite movies ever. It was made on a budget of 3 peanuts and pocket lint, and it shows, but damn it's an interesting premise.

[–] FlaminGoku@reddthat.com 8 points 7 months ago

Great movie. I enjoyed the lofi feel of Primer as it handled a really fun concept.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Guess this is why the TARDIS had to be a space ship as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 39 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Time machines have been invented dozens of times since the 1800s; there's s trail of them drifting through deep space.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 37 points 7 months ago (11 children)

Well, since this was posted in Science Memes, I'll be so pedantic that science does not support the idea of travelling back in time.

It does support travelling forwards in time, at various speeds, but you'll constantly be aware of where you are (even if one method involves travelling really fast and therefore may still leave you in empty space).

[–] deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm traveling forward in time right now.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago

Big, if true

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Dalvoron@lemm.ee 31 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I like the idea that time machines are like phones in that you need a receiver to pick up the signal. A consequence is that you can only travel back to the time that the machine was turned on.

[–] nailbar@sopuli.xyz 43 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Imagine building the first receiver, and immediately have 20 people spawn within the same space

[–] Pantless_Paladin@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago

More like 2 million inconsiderate time tourists comming to gawk at the first reciver..

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

You may enjoy Ted Chiang's The Merchant and the Alchemist's Gate, the short story.

The whole book is great if you like thought-provoking sci-fi premises I guess: https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/41160292

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hyphlosion@donphan.social 22 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Use a space time machine. Problem solved.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This meme format having a redemption arc is my favorite. It wasn’t super sexist, but it was just unnecessarily sexist.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 10 points 7 months ago

Rescue peepo from the nazis next.

[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 18 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Someone should build a space machine so we can travel through space freely

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Time machines don't exist and (as far as we know) cannot exist. Therefore, we can say they work however we want. If you can travel back in time, surely you can do that while remaining close to an arbitrary point of reference.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

How, uh, far back in time did you want to go?

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 9 points 7 months ago

That's probably the guy that offered people a few dollars and a chair to watch all of earth's history.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lolman228@kbin.social 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Jokes on you, space doesn't exist

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pyql@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I honestly think this would not happen because you would be time-travelling in the Earth's frame of reference

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, or if the time machine is genuinely a teleporter, then the invetor should at least know how to correct for drift.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago (5 children)

There is no space reference in time traveling only a time reference, the time traveler don't change his start point, but the Earth and the whole solarsystem do. If you travel 6 month to the future, you are still in the point where you started, but the Earth will be on the other site of the Sun. A time machine must be a spaceship, otherwise you won't survive. That is the error of almost all movies about time travel since H.G.Wells.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 13 points 7 months ago (27 children)

I think gravity is the solution to this problem. The time machine just has to be able to lock on to the earths gravitational force from across time

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 12 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Why would you time travel to a position relative to anything other than the earth?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›