Garbagio

Yeah! Drinky-drinky no thinky! Just like dad taught me.

If I wanted good advice I'd go see a shrink, not a green text forum. Nerd. /s

You got a source for that, chief?

God I remember this dipshit. Racist transphobic piece of shit. I guarantee if they strike down Obergefell, she'll jump back onboard to repeal Loving.

Ol' "red skull in a facemask"-lookin ass.

Honestly, I'm more offended that they photoshopped him to look like a normal person. Thiel looks like someone who got a skull replacement.

Or the years spent missing other opportunities because you're too focused on your regret missing the earlier opportunities.

Just kill me. I'm tired.

Yeah but what'll we do without the $5 cities will spend on actually testing rape kits?

What you have to understand is that the CEOs and upper management of these companies genuinely believe that human intelligence is just a predictive model. They are so divorced from humanity, from actual people, that they only trust each other, and even then, barely. Some psychologist posited that consciousness is in part predictive, then Curtis Yarvin latched onto that half-baked headline and wrote on it, and then these sick fucks all had the same ideas: That they each are always the smartest man in the room, that their genuinely shallow creativity is deeper than anyone else's, and that if the next guy who they consider almost as smart as themselves says it's because humans are just complex llm's then it must be true; that if they are barely smarter than this shittu technology, then all of humanity must be at or below it.

It's more important to you to hold some personal sense of moral superiority than engage with the death of millions; your blasé attitude speaks volumes towards your privilege. I have no doubt that the reason you don't want kids has far less to do with climate change than being able to say you won't because of climate change.

A) we don't need infinite growth; what we need is a tapering down so we don't end up with an entire generation spending their golden years in a ditch. B) As I've stated to another user, you're equivocating. Stop that. We've had the same percentile decrease in the last 20 years as we did throughout the previous century; you're looking at two different rates of decrease and calling them the same because they both happen to be decreases. That's not how math works.