Yes, if you want the scent to stick longer, you need a higher concentration, not more perfume.

I like EdP, you apply it in the morning and by the evening only the base notes are left, you can then re-apply if you are going out.

Generelly, the scent of a perfume always develops while you wear it. The top notes that can be smelled immediately after applying are gone after half an hour, then you can smell the middle notes and finally the base notes.

Concentration changes how long middle notes and base notes linger, the top notes always disappear fast.

It's also a matter of concentration. An EdC may last for only an hour, an Extrait you may smell for a few days.

about 150ml per year (that's for EdP)

To go to university.

I don't know about the historical reasons. But I do think it is good to have some ordinary people influencing the judgement as well, rather than just some judge sitting in their ivory tower.

As a cis man, I sometimes wonder what "cis" is even supposed to mean exactly.

I feel comfortable being a man, and I'm happy I don't have to deal with periods or worry about getting pregnant.

But I don't really tie my identity to my gender, and I guess there are a few things about me that are feminine, or at least not exactly masculine.

So my question is: how close does one have to adhere to the stereotype of ones at birt assigned sex to be considered "cis"

I guess she is telling him that he is too old to use this kinda language.

I don't, there's a canteen where I work.

I mean, people gotta die somehow. You could flip the map to show percentage of deaths due to cancer, and Romania would probably look quite good.

Incredibly difficult to limit it to five, ask me tomorrow and I'll probably come up with 5 others. Anyway

1. Left 4 Dead 2
2. Portal 2
3. Metro Exodus
4. Life is Strange 2
5. DayZ

Not saying this isn't true, but there is something that I have often wondered with this reasoning.

There have been some quite powerful socialist states. Sure, fledgeling socialist states were sabotaged by the US and it's allies. But they were also propped up by the USSR and it's allies.

So, if external sabotage explains the failure of socialist states, why wasn't support from powerful socialist allies enough to offset it? And why didn't comparable interference cause capitalist states to fail at similar rates?