Starski

joined 11 months ago
[–] Starski@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Looking into it, substitute teachers in my area make from 40-50k on average, so really not far off. Considering many jobs in my area already don't provide health insurance, it's really not the worst option for people specifically in my area. I'm sure this is by far the exception of course, just thought it was interesting.

[–] Starski@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Still not awful for my area, with a median income of 47k. But to be fair my area is poor as shit.

[–] Starski@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, he looks like Stanley Kubrick lol

[–] Starski@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

I was going to say lol, that's double the average wage in my city

[–] Starski@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 day ago (7 children)

But have you?

[–] Starski@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't really have time to read all of the screenshots, so were they actually defending tankies? Or was it just defending communism? Because I'm generally fine with many communist ideals, but supporting the actions of authoritarian regimes is a nono in my book.

[–] Starski@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

that's a fallacy and not a logical conclusion to draw

Which is exactly my point, as the person I was replying to was clearly implying that being male had something to do with the problem. If you don't see that with their phrasing, then you're being intentionally obtuse.

[–] Starski@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's like you didn't even read a single word of my comment, kinda funny.

[–] Starski@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago

Wanting people to be able to afford food is leftist plant things? Is this satire? Or are you just stupid, it's getting hard to tell these days.

[–] Starski@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

great comment

Why, because it portrays men as evil? Because that seems to be your whole point, simplifying the problem to be based around sex, and not overall societal concerns. And what does entitlement have to do with 90-95% of family annihilators being male, are you labeling all men as entitled?

[–] Starski@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And what, just stole the PlayStation? If you've spent no actual money on Sony then you're by far the exception of PlayStation owners, and not the norm. It's funny how you don't realize that.

[–] Starski@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You spent a single dollar at the company so you support everything you do

Is a reductive an juvenile way of interpreting the original comment, how ironic. He's right, it seems during weekends peak PlayStation users go above 100 million, which would mean if even 1 million people followed this boycott, that's less than 1% of their active user base. It's too late, and it's because people like you spend hundreds of dollars for their hardware and service, year after year, and then you belittle it because you're in denial of making an awful decision.

 

spoiler

October

view more: next ›